期刊文献+

复杂性输尿管上段结石治疗中经皮肾镜与输尿管镜的应用效果 被引量:2

Application effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of complicated upper ureteral calculi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究复杂性输尿管上段结石治疗中经皮肾镜与输尿管镜的应用效果。方法选取82例复杂性输尿管上段结石患者,根据治疗方法分为对照组(41例)与研究组(41例)。对照组选用经皮肾镜,研究组选用输尿管镜。比较两组患者的手术效果。结果与对照组比较,研究组住院时间更短,术中出血量更少,手术时间更长,治疗总有效率更高(P<0.05)。两组患者治疗后并发症总发生率无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论复杂性输尿管上段结石治疗中输尿管镜的应用效果优于经皮肾镜,可缩短患者住院时间,减少术中出血量,提升结石清除率,且安全性高,值得推广应用。 Objective To study the application effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of complicated upper ureteral calculi.Methods A total of 82 patients with complicated upper ureteral calculi were selected and divided into control group(41 cases) and study group(41 cases) according to the treatment methods. The control group used percutaneous nephroscope, while the study group used ureteroscopy. The operative effects of patients were compared between the two groups.Results Compared with the control group, the study group had shorter hospital stay, less bleeding in operation, longer operation time, higher total efficiency(P〈0.05). There was no difference in the total incidences of complications after treatment between the two groups(P〈0.05).Conclusion The ureteroscopy in the treatment of complicated upper ureteral calculi has better application effect than percutaneous nephrolithotomy, which can shorten hospital time, reduce intraoperative blood loss, enhance the calculi clearance rate, with high security. It is worthy of popularization and application.
作者 尚向涛 尚亚楠 SHANG Xiang-tao;SHANG Ya-nan(Urology Department,Xi'an No.1 Hospital,Xi'an 710000;the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology,Luoyang 471003,China)
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2018年第20期44-45,共2页 Clinical Research and Practice
关键词 复杂性输尿管上段结石 经皮肾镜 输尿管镜 complicated upper ureteral calculi percutaneous nephroscope ureteroscope
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献59

  • 1陈合群,廖锦堂,齐范,周炜,齐琳,陈湘,陈智勇,谢晋良,申鹏飞,张时纯.经皮肾镜取石术处理肾结石[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(6):374-376. 被引量:85
  • 2卢德祥,程险峰,孙大鹏,刘松梅,杨冬梅,亢渐.经皮肾镜取石和经尿道输尿管镜碎石治疗输尿管上段结石的疗效比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2006,21(11):836-837. 被引量:19
  • 3陈小刚,张青汉,董能本,叶绪龙,潘卫斌,彭伟.微创经皮肾穿刺碎石术和经尿道输尿管镜下碎石术治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石的疗效比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2007,22(8):614-615. 被引量:8
  • 4Zeng GH,Zhao Z,Wan SP. et al. Minimally invasive per-cutaneous nephrolithotomy for simple and complex renalcalyceal stones : a comparative analysis of over 10000 cas-es[J]. J Endourol,2013,8(7) :557-562.
  • 5Lei M ,Zhu W,Wan SP. et aL Safety and efficacy of minimallyinvasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with au-tosomal dominant polycystic kidneys disease [J]. J Endourol,2013,8(7):892-899.
  • 6Zeng G,Mai Z’Zhao Z,et al. Treatment of upper urinary cal-culi with Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy : a single-center experience with 12,482 con-secutive patients over 20 years [J], Urolithiasis, 2013,41 (3):225-229.
  • 7Abdelhafez MF,Amend B,Bedke J,et al. Minimally inva-sive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative study ofthe management of small and large renal stones [J]. Urology,2013,81(2):241-245.
  • 8Kumar A,Nanda B,Kumar N,et al. A prospective random-ized comparison between shock wave lithotripsy and semi-rigid ureteroscopy for upper ureteric stones < 2 cm:a sin-gle center experience [J]. J Endourol,2013,9(5) :89-92.
  • 9Khalil M. Management of impacted proximal ureteral stone :extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopywith holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy [J]. Urol Ann,2013,5(2):88-92.
  • 10Ito H,Kawahara T,Terap H,et al. Evaluation of preoper-ative measurement of stone surface area as a predictor ofstone-free status after combined ureteroscopy with holmi-um laser lithotripsy : a single-center experience [J], J En-dourol,2013,27(6) :715-721.

共引文献54

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部