4Winzer,M.A.1993,The history of special edu-cation:From isolation to integration.Washington,D.C.:Gallaudet University Press,p21.
5Cook,B.,Semmel,M.,& Gerber,M.1999,"Attitudes of principals and special education teach-ers toward the inclusion of students with mild disabilities",Remedial and special education 20(4),pp199-207.
6Gerber,M.M.1994,"Postmodemism in special educa-tion",The Journal of Special Education 28 (3),pp368-378.
7Kuhn,S.K.1970,The structure of scientific rev-olutions (2nd nd.).Chicago:University of Chicago Press,p43.
8Patton,M.Q.1990,Qualitative evaluation and re-search methods.Newbury Park,Calif.:Sage Publications,p7.
9Guba,E.C.1990,"The alternative paradigm dia-log",In E.C.Guba (Ed.),The paradigm dialog.New-bury Park,Calif.:Sage Publications,pp17-31.
10Greene,J.C.,& Caracelli,V.J.1997,"Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed-method evalua-tion",In J.C.Greene & V.J.Caracelli (Eds.),Ad-vances in mixed-method evaluation:The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms.San Francisco,Calif.:Jossey-Bass,pp5-19.
