肺结核患者应用需要层次理论护理的价值分析

Analysis of Nursing Value of Hierarchy of Needs Theory in Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis

目的分析肺结核患者应用需要层次理论护理的价值。方法 2017年1月—2018年3月间将84例肺结核患者视为调查对象,随机编号法纳入实验组与参照组(n=42)。参照组实施常规护理,实验组应用需要层次理论护理模式,比较干预效果。结果实验组患者的整体护理、健康教育及病室管理评分分别为(92.34±2.98)分,(91.88±3.08)分及(93.51±4.46)分,参照组患者分数分别为(60.23±2.11)分、(61.65±2.21)分、(62.18±2.34)分,两组间评分差异有统计学意义(t=17.04、15.57、16.74,P=0.000)。参照组生理机能评分为(43.45±6.52)分、躯体疼痛(48.12±4.02)分、情感健康(37.14±5.22)分及一般健康状态(46.23±6.56)分;实验组患者的生理机能评分为(86.22±7.12)分、躯体疼痛(80.65±4.45)分、情感健康(86.56±5.56)分及一般健康状态(86.91±7.87)分对比差异统计学意义(t=18.61、17.21、22.01、19.82,P=0.000)。结论需要层次理论护理能够满足患者的自我实现需求,有助于提升患者的护理工作满意度。

Objective To analyze the nursing value of hierarchy of needs theory in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Methods From January 2017 to Mach 2018,84 cases of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis admitted and treated in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into two groups with 42 cases in each, the control group used the routine nursing, while the experimental group used the hierarchy of needs theory model, and the intervention effect was compared between the two groups. Results The holistic nursing, health education and ward management scores in the experimental group and in the control group were respectively（92.34±2.98）points,（91.88±3.08）points,（93.51±4.46）points and（60.23±2.11）points,（61.65±2.21）points,（62.18±2.34）points, and the differences were obvious（t=17.04, 15.57, 16.74, P=0.000）, and the physiological function score and somatic pains, emotional health and general health state in the control group and in the experimental group were respectively（43.45 ±6.52）points,（48.12 ±4.02）points,（37.14±5.22）points,（46.23±6.56）points and（86.22 ±7.12）points,（80.65 ±4.45）points,（86.56 ±5.56）points,（86.91 ±7.87）points, and the differences were statistically significant（t=18.61, 17.21, 22.01, 19.82,P=0.000）. Conclusion The hierarchy of needs theory can meet the demands of self-fulfillment, which contributes to improving the satisfactory degree of nursing work.