期刊文献+

论我国庭前会议制度的完善和发展

Research on the Development and Improvement of China's Pretrial Conference System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 庭前会议制度起源于英美法系国家,并由诸多国家所吸收,我国2012年《刑事诉讼法》正式确立了庭前会议制度。虽然庭前会议的设立有利于促进我国刑事司法制度的完善,但是由于我国设置该项制度时间较晚,在立法和实践中,庭前会议制度暴露了诸多问题,例如庭前会议制度程序设置不规范、内容涉及实体问题等等。为完善庭前会议制度,应当围绕被告人参与权、庭前会议的启动方式,庭前会议的召集主持等问题,提出完善庭前会议制度的有效办法,例如赋予被告人参与权、明确庭前会议启动方式、将庭前会议的法官与庭审法官分离等等。 The system of pretrial conference originated from Anglo American law and has been absorbed by many countries. In2012, the Chinese Criminal Procedure Law formally brought in pretrial conference system. The aim of pretrial meetings is to improveChina's criminal justice system, however, due to the fact that it has been only a very short time since it is built up, many problems arise, such as non-standardization and confusion with substantive issues, etc. In order to improve the system of pretrial meetings, weshould around the rights of participation of the accused, ways to launch a pretrial meeting, the convening of pretrial meetings, etc. Wewill put forward some effective suggestions, such as giving defendant the right of participation, clarifying the ways to start up a pretrialmeeting, separating judges of the pretrial meetings from the trial judges, and so on.
作者 刘鎏 LIU Liu(College of Graduate,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100000,China)
出处 《齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2018年第8期82-84,共3页 Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
关键词 庭前会议 程序 内容 完善 pretrial conference procedure content improvement
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献9

  • 1无锡市滨湖区人民法院、人民检察院和司法局共同签署了《刑事案件庭前会议实施纪要》.
  • 2盐城市亭湖区人民法院、人民检察院和司法局共同通过了《刑事公诉案件庭前会议实施意见(试行)》.
  • 3《美国刑事诉讼规则》(Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure)第17.1条.
  • 4英国《2013年刑事诉讼规则》(The Criminal Procedure Rules 2013)第15 .1条.
  • 5“中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定”,载《中国共产党第十八届中央委员会第四次全体会议文件汇编》,人民出版社2014年版,第45页.
  • 6“Precisely because confessions of guilt,whether coerced or freely given,may be truthful and potent evidence,we did not believe a jury could be called upon to ignore the probative value of a truthful but coerced confession;it was also likely,we thought,that in judging voluntariness itself the jury would be influenced by the reliability of a confession it considered an accurate account of the facts.”From Lego v.Twomey,404 U.S.477,92 S.Ct.619,30 L.Ed.2d618 (1972).
  • 7Wayne R.La Fave,Jerold H.Israel,Nancy J.King,Orin S.Kerr,Criminal Procedure,Fifth Edition,Minnesota:West,pp.568.
  • 8陈子楠,杨宇冠.非法证据在庭前会议中的排除方式研究[J].南京社会科学,2015(3):108-111. 被引量:10
  • 9左卫民.未完成的变革 刑事庭前会议实证研究[J].中外法学,2015,27(2):469-483. 被引量:57

共引文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部