期刊文献+

MRI常规扫描结合MRCP对胆管内乳头状肿瘤的诊断价值 被引量:4

Value of MRI conventional scanning combined with MRCP in diagnosis of IPN
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨磁共振成像(MRI)结合磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)扫描对胆管内乳头状肿瘤(IPN)的诊断价值。方法对80例IPN患者分别进行MRI常规扫描与MRCP扫描,分析各自检查结果的影像学特征,比较MRI与MRCP单独或联合检查对IPN诊断的准确率。结果 MRI组的确诊率为76.3%,低于MRCP组的86.3%(P<0.05);而MRI+MRCP组的确诊率为96.3%,高于MRI组和MRCP组(P<0.05)。结论在IPN的诊断中,采用MRI与MRCP联合检查,能够提高对疾病诊断的准确率。 Objective To explore the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) scanning in the diagnosis of intraductal papillary neoplasm (IPN). Methods A total of 80 patients with IPN received MRI conventional scanning and MRCP scanning. The imaging characteristics were analyzed on the basis of the examination results, and the accuracies of MRI and MRCP conducted separately or jointly in the diagnosis of IPN were compared. Results The co,ffirmed diagnostic rate in the MRI group was 76.3%, which was lower than the 86.3% in the MRCP group(P 〈 0.05); the confirmed diagnostic rate in the MRI +MRCP group was 96.3%, which was higher than that in the MRI group and the MRCP group (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion In the diagnosis of IPN, the combination of MRI and MRCP can improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of IPN.
作者 吴辉 李群兰 Wu Hui;Li Qunlan(Department of Radiology,Department of Radiology,the People's Hospital of Pengzhou,Pengzhou,Sichuan,611930,China)
出处 《西南国防医药》 CAS 2018年第8期711-713,共3页 Medical Journal of National Defending Forces in Southwest China
关键词 胆管 乳头状肿瘤 MRI MRCP 诊断 IPN MRI MRCP diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献55

  • 1李绍林,张雪林,陈燕萍,陈斌,苍鹏.肝内周围型胆管细胞癌CT和MRI诊断及病理基础研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(10):1072-1074. 被引量:102
  • 2王中秋,卢光明,黎介寿,李维勤.肝内外胆管及胆囊扩张程度和低位梗阻性黄疸病变的相关性[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(8):847-851. 被引量:15
  • 3余开湖,盛炼,朱华浩,何家湖,潘盛信.梗阻性黄疸的低场强磁共振胰胆管成像[J].放射学实践,2005,20(9):787-790. 被引量:15
  • 4王礼同,李澄,刘淑慧,袁红梅,何玲,陈建.肝外胆管梗阻病变MSCT曲面重建胆管成像与MRCP的比较研究[J].生物医学工程与临床,2006,10(3):147-150. 被引量:6
  • 5Klatskin G. Adenocarcinoma of the hepatic duct at its bi-furcation with- in the porta hepatic:an unusual tumor with distinctive clinical and path- ological feature[J]. Am J Med,1965,38(6) :241 -244.
  • 6Low RN,Sigeti JS, Francis IR. Fo Tk: Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction efficacy of fast muhiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR im- aging vs spin-echo MR imaging CT and cholangiography [ J ]. A JR, 1994,162(2) :315 -317.
  • 7Manfredi R,Masaelli G,Maresca G,et al. MR imaging and MRCP of hi- lar Chohngiocarcinoma [ J ]. Abdominal Imaging, 2003,28 ( 3 ) : 319 -321.
  • 8Lopera JE, Soto JA. Malignant hilar and perihilar biliary ob-struetion use of MR cholangiographyto define the extent of biliary ductal in-volve- ment andplan percutaneous interventions [ J ]. Radiology, 2001,220 (1) :90 -92.
  • 9Santoro R, Sentort- E, Ettorre GM. Bemgn hilerstenosis mimicking Klatskin tumor[ J]. Ann Chir,2004,129 ( 5 ) :297 - 300.
  • 10VennervaldBJ, Polman K. Helminths and malignancy [J]. ParasiteImmunol, 2009, 31(11): 686-696.

共引文献88

同被引文献31

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部