4GUNTER S, CHRISTOPH W, LUTZ M. Modelling the Contact Between Wheel and Rail Within Muhibody System Simulation [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2004, 41 (5): 349-364.
5NETTER H, SCHUPP G, RUI.KA W, et al. New As pects of Contact Modelling and Validation within Multi body System Simulation of Railway Vehicles[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 1998, 28(S): 246-269.
6POLACH O. Characteristic Parameters of Nonlinear wheel/rail Contact Geometry[J]. Vehicle System Dy namics, 2010,48(S) :19-36.
7British Standards Institution. BS EN 14363:2005 Railway Applications- Testing for the Acceptance of Running Characteristics of Railway Vehicles Testing of Running Behavior and Stationary Tests[S]. London: British Stand ards Institution, 2005.
8International Union of Railways. UIC Code 518 Testing and Approval of Railway Vehicles from the Point of View of their Dynamic Behavior - Safety Track fatigue - Ride Quality[S]. 3rd ed. Paris: International Union of Railways, 2005.
9British Standards Institution. Applications- Method for BS EN 15302:2008 Railway Determining the Equivalent Conicity[S]. London: British Standards Institution, 2008.
10International Union of Railways. UIC Code 519 Method for Determining the Equivalent Conicity[S]. 1st ed. Paris: In ternational Union of Railways, 2004.
