期刊文献+

新生儿感染性疾病127例临床研究 被引量:2

Clinical study on 127 cases with suspected early-onset sepsis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨新生儿感染性疾病实验室非特异性指标相关因素的诊断价值。方法选取2016年7月至2017年7月承德市中心医院NICU收治的127例出生0~3 d的感染性疾病患儿为感染组,103例0~3 d非感染性疾病新生儿为对照组,比较两组新生儿的临床症状、围产期因素以及实验室指标等。结果与对照组新生儿相比,感染组患儿喂养困难(15.7%)、呼吸困难(30.7%)、呻吟(31.5%)、皮肤黄染(18.1%)和窒息(5%)等初始症状差异均有统计学意义(χ~2=4.136、24.574、33.282、38.039,P均<0.001)。围产期因素中两组新生儿母亲孕晚期有感染病史和胎膜早破>18 h两个因素差异有统计学意义(χ~2=10.536、10.717,P均=0.001)。实验室指标结果显示,两组新生儿C-反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞计数以及中性粒细胞百分比差异均有统计学意义(t=2.740、P=0.008,t=6.378、P<0.001,t=4.860、P<0.001)。感染组患儿ROC曲线分析显示:CRP、白细胞计数、中性粒细胞百分比最佳截断点分别为8.0 mg/dl、12.65×109/L和63.15%,敏感性分别为24.3%、62.2%和68.9%,特异性分别为99.0%、81.2%和84.4%,曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.544、0.707和0.769;CRP、白细胞计数和中性粒细胞百分比三者联合敏感性为83.8%,特异性为75.0%,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.860,显著高于单项指标。结论新生儿感染性疾病的发生与多种围产期因素密切相关,以呼吸系统症状为始发临床表现多见。CRP、白细胞计数和中性粒细胞百分比联合诊断可以提高诊断价值。围产期因素、临床表现和实验室指标相结合,有利于早期识别新生儿感染性疾病。 Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of related nonspecific indexes in the laboratory factors for neonatal infectious diseases. Methods From July 2016 to July 2017, a total of 127 cases with infectious diseases in NICU of Chengde Central Hospital were selected as infection group, while 103 cases of non-infection newborns(0-3 day) were taken as the control group. Perinatal factors, laboratory indicators and other clinical factors were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, initial symptoms such as feeding difficulties(15.7%), breathing difficulties(30.7%), groans(31.5%), yellow skin stains(18.1%) and suffocation(5%) were significantly different in the infection group(χ~2 = 4.136, 24.574, 33.282, 38.039; all P 0.001). There were significant differences of perinatal factors between the two groups of newborns with a history of infection in the late stages of pregnancy and premature rupture of the fetal membrane 18 h(χ~2 = 10.536, 10.717; both P = 0.001). The results of laboratory indicators showed that the C-reactive protein(CRP), count of white blood cell(WBC) and percentage of neutrophils between newborns in the two groups were all significantly different(t = 2.740, P = 0.008; t = 6.378, P 0.001; t = 4.860, P 0.001). The ROC curve analysis of infection group showed that the best cutoff points for CRP, count of WBC and neutrophils were 8.0 mg/dl, 12.65 × 109/L and 63.15%, respectively; the sensitivity were 24.3%, 62.2% and 68.9%, respectively; the specificity were 99.0%, 81.2% and 84.4%, respectively; and the area under the curve(AUC) were 0.544, 0.707 and 0.769, respectively. The combined sensitivity of CRP, count of WBC and neutrophils was 83.8%, the specificity was 75.0%, and the AUC was 0.860, which was significantly higher than the individual index. Conclusions The incidence of neonatal infectious diseases is closely related to many perinatal factors, and mainly showed the clinical manifestations of respiratory symptoms. The combined diagnosis of leukocyte count and neutrophil percentage could improve the diagnostic value. The combination of perinatal factors, clinical manifestations and laboratory indexes are beneficial to the early identification of neonatal infectious diseases.
作者 白萌萌 孟林 李文 崔玉婕 张冬梅 桑艳峰 刘咏梅 唐静 Bai Mengmeng;Meng Lin;Li Wen;Cui Yujie;Zhang Dongmei;Sang Yanfeng;Liu Yongmei;Tang Jing(Chengde Medical University,Chengde 067000,China;Chengde Central Hospital(Second Clinical College of Chengde Medical College),Chengde 067000,China)
出处 《中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2018年第3期272-277,共6页 Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition)
基金 承德市科学技术研究及发展项目(No.201706A026)
关键词 新生儿 感染 C-反应蛋白 白细胞 中性粒细胞 诊断 Newborn Infective C- reactive protein Leukocyte Neutrophil Diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献74

  • 1陈自励,李凤英.18城市早产与低体重儿死亡率及死因调查[J].中华妇产科杂志,1993,28(1):27-30. 被引量:16
  • 2胡亚美,江载芳,主编.诸福棠实用儿科学[M].7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2001:477-478.
  • 3肖紫安.新生儿尸检1000例病理分析[J].上海第一医学院学报,1985(2):99-102.
  • 4中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.2011年我国卫生事业发展统计公报[EB/OL].http://www.moh.gov.cn/zwgkzt/pnb/201204/54532.shtml.2012-04-20/2013-04-05.
  • 5中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.2012中国卫生统计年鉴[EB/OL].[2014-03-01].http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/htmlfiles/zwgkzt/ptjnj/year2012/index2012.html.
  • 6Feng XL, Guo S, Hipgrave D, et al. China's facility-based birth strategy and neonatal mortality: a population-based epidemiological study[J]. Lancet, 2011,378:1493-1500.
  • 7Rajaratnam JK, Marcus JR, Flaxman AD, et al. Neonatal, postneonatal, childhood, and under-5 mortality for 187 countries, 1970-2010: a systematic analysis of progress towardsMillennium Development Goal 4[J]. Lancet, 2010, 375:1988- 2008.
  • 8Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? [J]. Lancet, 2005, 365:891-900.
  • 9Dolk H, Loane M, Garne E. The prevalence of congenital anomalies in Europe[J]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2010, 686:349-364.
  • 10Fanaroff AA, Stoll B J, Wright LL, et al. Trends in neonatal morbidity and mortality for very low birthweight infants[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 196:147.el-8.

共引文献70

同被引文献22

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部