期刊文献+

核能和平利用的伦理评估初探

A Preliminary Study of the Ethical Assessment of the Peaceful Use of Nuclear Energy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 核能作为一种浓缩、清洁、相对安全、技术成熟的能源,成为新世纪最现实的替代能源之一。然而,在发生了少有的几次安全事故以后,核能和平利用面临着全球性信任危机。对核能和平利用的困难主要在于其伦理方面。为此,对每项和平利用核能项目给予基于功利主义和道义论的综合伦理评估,是推进核能和平利用的重要举措。在中国,一些省份的核能项目大都遇到了公众的抵触。如果核能项目的伦理评估得到大多数公众的认可,我们就可以使核能充分发挥其技术优势,更好地为中国的经济建设服务。 Nuclear energy,as a concentrated,clean,relatively safe and mature energy source,has become one of the most realistic alternative energy resources in this century. However,after a few security incidents,the peaceful use of nuclear energy faces a global crisis of confidence. It is believed that the difficulties in the peaceful use of nuclear energy mainly lie in the ethical aspects. Therefore,comprehensive ethical assessments based on utilitarianism and deontology for each item of peaceful use of nuclear energy is an important way to promote its peaceful use. Considering that most nuclear energy projects in some provinces of China are resisted by the public,the ethical evaluation of the nuclear energy projects will be helpful for gaining public recognition,and making nuclear energy give full play to its technical advantages and better serve China's economic development.
作者 高杨帆 叶温丹 GAO Yang-fan;YE Wen-dan(School of Marxism,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China)
出处 《洛阳师范学院学报》 2018年第6期8-12,共5页 Journal of Luoyang Normal University
基金 湖北省社科基金(2015103) 湖北科协国家思想库课题(HBKX2015KT014)
关键词 核能和平利用 功利主义 道义论 综合伦理评估 决策意义 peaceful use of nuclear energy utilitarianism deontology comprehensive ethical evaluation decision making significance
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献35

  • 1A.格鲁恩瓦尔德.现代技术伦理学的理论可能与实践意义[J].国外社会科学,1997(6):10-14. 被引量:19
  • 2M.邦格,吴晓江.科学技术的价值判断与道德判断[J].世界哲学,1993(3):35-41. 被引量:37
  • 3杨支兰,李秋萍.护理专业价值观研究进展[J].护理研究(上旬版),2006,20(3):568-570. 被引量:27
  • 4安东尼·吉登斯.现代性的后果[M].南京:译林出版社,2000..
  • 5Brian Wynne. Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science[J]. Public Understanding of Science, 1992,(1):281-340.
  • 6Brian Wynne.Knowledges in context [J].Science Technology and Human Values,1991,19: 1-17.
  • 7约瑟夫·劳斯.知识与权利:走向科学的政治哲学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004.77.
  • 8House of Lords. Science and Society[R]. London: Her Majesty's stationary, 2000.
  • 9Gene Rowe Lynn Frewer. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation[J]. Science Technology and Human Values, 2000. 3-29.
  • 10John Durant.Participatory technology assessment and the democratic model of the public understanding of science[J]. Science and Public Policy, 1999,(5): 313-319.

共引文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部