期刊文献+

改良经剑突下及肋弓下切口术式与传统经胸壁切口术式切除胸腺肿瘤的临床疗效对比研究 被引量:13

Clinical Comparative Study of Modified Subxiphoid-subcostal Approach and Traditional Transthoracic Approach for the Resection of Thymic Tumors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较改良经剑突下及肋弓下切口术式与传统经胸壁切口术式切除胸腺肿瘤的临床疗效。方法选取2013年1月—2017年12月于沧州市中心医院胸外科行胸腺肿瘤切除术的患者175例,根据切口入路不同分为剑突下切口组(95例)与胸壁切口组(80例)。剑突下切口组应用改良经剑突下及肋弓下切口术式,胸壁切口组应用传统经胸壁切口术式。比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后带管时间、住院时间及术后第1、3天视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、术后并发症情况。结果剑突下切口组手术时间、术后带管时间、住院时间短于胸壁切口组,术中出血量少于胸壁切口组,术后第1、3天VAS评分及并发症发生率低于胸壁切口组(P<0.05)。结论改良经剑突下及肋弓下切口术式切较传统经胸壁切口术式切除胸腺肿瘤的手术时间短,操作更简单,患者创伤更小,术后疼痛更轻,恢复快,住院时间短,且并发症少。 Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of modified subxiphoid-subcostal approach with that of traditional transthoracic approach for the resection of thymic tumors(RTT).Methods The subjects enrolled in this study were 175 patients undergoing RTT in Department of Thoracic Surgery,Cangzhou Central Hospital from January 2013 to December 2017.95 of them receiving RTT via modified subxiphoid-subcostal approach and 80 via the traditional transthoracic approach were assigned to subxiphoid incision group and chest wall incision group,respectively.The clinical efficacy of these two approaches was compared from the duration of RTT,intraoperative blood loss,duration of postoperative chest tube drainage,length of stay,VAS score assessed on the 1 st,3 rd days after surgery,and incidence of postoperative complications.Results Compared with the chest wall incision group,subxiphoid incision group demonstrated much shorter duration of RTT,duration of postoperative chest tube drainage and length of stay,significantly less intraoperative blood loss,obviously lower VAS score on the 1 st,3 rd days after surgery as well as notable lower incidence of postoperative complications(P〈0.05).Conclusion RTT via the modified subxiphoid-subcostal approach is more simple to operate,requiring shorter duration.Moreover,it is contributive to smaller incision,lighter degree of postoperative pain,quicker recovery,shorter length of stay as well as lower incidence of postoperative complications among the patients.
作者 孟庆军 孔繁义 宋翔 MENG Qing-jun;KONG Fan-yi;SONG Xiang(Department of Thoracic Surgery,Cangzhou Central Hospital,Cangzhou 061000,China)
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS 北大核心 2018年第21期2602-2605,共4页 Chinese General Practice
基金 沧州市重点研发计划指导项目(172302045)
关键词 胸腺肿瘤 胸腔镜 疗效比较研究 Thymus neoplasms Thoraeoseopy Comparative effectiveness research
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献64

共引文献135

同被引文献98

引证文献13

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部