期刊文献+

基于MPA考虑土-结构相互作用的RC框架抗震性能的研究 被引量:2

Research on method of MPA with considering SSI in evaluating seismic performance of RC frame
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用ATC-40推荐的土集中参数模型,将土-结构相互作用引入MPA分析中,并考虑重力荷载下的P-Δ效应,研究RC框架的抗震性能。利用SAP2000对一10层RC框架分别进行考虑SSI的MPA分析、Accel和Mode1侧向加载模式的Pushover分析以及非线性动力时程分析,进行不同场地类型下结构抗震性能的评估。多遇地震结果表明:考虑SSI的MPA分析最接近时程分析的结果,顶点位移和层间位移角误差分别在10%和20%以内。罕遇地震结果表明:考虑SSI效应后,常规Pushover分析的误差较大,已不能满足精度要求;而考虑SSI的MPA在一定程度上能评估结构的抗震性能。若结构未倒塌,考虑SSI的MPA能较好地估计塑性铰的分布;若结构倒塌,考虑SSI的MPA得到的梁铰分布与时程分析较一致,然而低估了底层柱铰的塑性变形,但不影响对结构薄弱层的判断。 This paper used the lumped parameter model of soil recommended by ATC-40 to consider soil-structure interaction into MPA,meanwhile including the P-Δ effect under gravity load. A 10-story RC frame was set up by SAP2000 to conduct SSI research respectively through MPA, Pushover analysis with loading mode Accel or Mode1 and nonlinear dynamic time history analysis, evaluating the seismic performance of structure under different types of ground. Research under frequent earthquakes shows that the results of MPA are most close to the results of time history analysis, with errors of roof displacement are all within 10% and errors of story drift are all within 20%. Research under severe earthquakes shows that with considering SSI, the errors of Pushover analysis with Accel or Mode1 are extremely large, not meeting precision requirement; While MPA with considering SSI can evaluate the seismic performance of the structure to a certain extent. If the structure is not collapsed, MPA can estimate the distribution of plastic hinge; if the structure collapsed, the beam hinges distribution of MPA are similar to time history analysis. MPA underestimate the plastic deformation of bottom column hinge, but it does not affect the judgment of the weak layer.
作者 曾裕林 王海东 陈曦 李建文 ZENG Yulin;WANG Haidong;CHEN Xi;LI Jianwen(College of Civil Engineering,Hunan University,Changsha 410082,China;Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Energy Efficiency of the Ministry of Education,Hunan University,Changsha 410082,China)
出处 《铁道科学与工程学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第7期1793-1802,共10页 Journal of Railway Science and Engineering
基金 新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助项目(NCET-13-0190)
关键词 土-结构相互作用 模态PUSHOVER RC框架 楼层位移 层间位移角 soil-structure interaction modal Pushover analysis RC frame story displacement inter-layer drift
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献37

  • 1侯爽,欧进萍.结构Pushover分析的侧向力分布及高阶振型影响[J].地震工程与工程振动,2004,24(3):89-97. 被引量:112
  • 2陆新征,缪志伟,江见鲸,叶列平.静力和动力荷载作用下混凝土高层结构的倒塌模拟[J].山西地震,2006(2):7-11. 被引量:43
  • 3KALKAN E,SASHI S K. Adaptive modal combination procedure for nonlinear static analysis of building structures [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2006, 132(11): 1721-1731.
  • 4KRAWINKLAR H, SENEVIRATNA G D P K. Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation [J]. Engineering Structures, 1998, 20 (4/6):452-464.
  • 5CHOPRAAK, GOEL R K. A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2002, 31(3):561-582.
  • 6CHOPRA A K, GOEL R K, CHINTANAPAKDEE C. Evaluation of a modified MPA procedure assuming higher modes as elastic to estimate seismic demands[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2004, 20 ( 3 ):757-778.
  • 7MAZZONI S, MCKENNA F, SCOTT M H, et al. OpenSees users manual[R]. Berkeley: University of California, 2006.
  • 8SCOTT B D,PARK R, PRIESTLEY M J N. Stressstrain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1982, 79(1):13-27.
  • 9SCOTT M H, FRANCHIN P, FENVES G L, et al. Response sensitivity for nonlinear beam-column elements[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004, 130(9):1281-1288.
  • 10BORZI B, ELNASHAI A S. Refined force reduction factors for seismic design [J]. Journal of Engineering Structures, 2000, 22(5): 1244-1260.

共引文献252

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部