期刊文献+

住院头颈癌患者抑郁筛查和评估的最佳证据应用 被引量:4

The best evidence for depression screening and assessment in patients with head and neck cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的将住院头颈癌患者抑郁筛查和评估的最佳证据应用于临床实践,改善护士对住院头颈癌患者抑郁筛查和评估的行为和循证实践的依从性。方法 2016年6-9月对我院收治的52例头颈癌患者及24名护士遵循JBI循证护理中心临床证据实践的程序:证据应用前基线审查、实践变革和证据应用后效果的再审查。通过检索癌症患者抑郁筛查和评估相关证据并制定7条审查指标。采用现场观察法、访谈、查阅护理病历收集数据;分析每条证据应用存在的障碍、解决方法,制定实践方案。以护士每条指标行为依从性来评价证据应用前后的有效性。结果证据应用后JBI护理质量审查的7条指标的执行率:指标1-1、指标1-2、指标2、指标3与指标4均有显著提高(P<0.05)。指标1-3、指标5、指标6、指标7均为特殊案例的处理,无需计算执行率。证据应用后筛查出2例中度抑郁者,1例重度抑郁者、1例自伤者和1例他伤患者;护士知识水平测试平均得分从基线(22.79±6.75)分增加至(96.67±2.76)分。证据应用期间抑郁发生率为9.61%。结论住院头颈癌患者抑郁筛查和评估的最佳证据应用能规范护士抑郁评估和筛查的护理行为,从而提高抑郁管理质量。
出处 《护士进修杂志》 2018年第11期987-991,共5页 Journal of Nurses Training
基金 上海市教委2015年科研创新立项课题(编号:15ZZ004-09)
关键词 循证护理 最佳实践 头颈癌 抑郁 评估 筛查 Evidence based nursing Best practice Head and neck cancer Depression Assessment Screening
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献10

  • 1Lamagne P, McPhee M. Trouble shooting paediatric pe- ripheral IVs: phlebitis and infiltration[J]. Nurs Spec- trum,2004,8(13) :18-20.
  • 2Gomes A C R, Silva C A G, Gamarra C J, et al. Assess- ment of phlebitis, infiltration and extravasation events in neonates submitted to intravenous therapy[J]. Escola Anna Nery,2011,15(3) :472-479.
  • 3Foster L, Wallis M, Paterson B, et al. A descriptive study of peripheral intravenous catheters in patients ad- mitted to a pediatric unit in one Australian hospital[J]. JIn{us Nurs,2002,25(3) :159-167.
  • 4Kim J S, Lee Y R, Kim N S. Effects of the structured nursing intervention for caregivers on maintenance of in- travenous infusions in infants[J]. J Korean Aead Child Health Nurs,2012,18(3) : 135-142.
  • 5Pettit J. Assessment of the infant with a peripheral intra- venous device[J]. Adv Neonatal Care, 2003,3 (5) : 230- 240.
  • 6Thigpen J L. Peripheral intravenous extravasation: nur- sing procedure for initial treatment[J]. Neonatal Netw, 2007,26 (6) : 379-384.
  • 7Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, Seers K, et al. An explo- ration of the factors that influence the implementation of evidence into practice[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2004,13 (8) : 913- 924.
  • 8Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emer- ging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of reeommendation[J]. BMJ, 2008,336 (7650) : 924-926.
  • 9The Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation Working Party. Supporting Document for the Joanna Briggs Institute levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation[J]. The Joanna Briggs Institute. 2014. ht- tp://joannabriggs, org/ibi-approach, html tabbed-nay Lev- els-of-Evidence.
  • 10Balshem H, Hell M, Schunemann, HJ,et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence[J]. J of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011,64(4) :401-406.

共引文献1675

同被引文献30

引证文献4

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部