1Black, P. & D. Wiliam. Assessment and classroom learning [ J ]. Assessment in Education, 1998, 5 ( 1 ) : 7 - 74.
2Butler, R. Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation : Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest and performance [J].Journal of Educational Psychology, 1987, 78 (4) : 210 -216.
3Butler, R. Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and involvement [ J ]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1988, 58:1 - 14.
4Butler, D. L. & P. H. Winne. Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis [J]. Review of Educational Research, 1995, 65 (3):245-281.
5Cariaga-Lo, L.D. , B. F. Richards & A. W. Frye. Understanding learning and performance in context: A proposal model of self-assessment [ C] //Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Illinois: Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 1992.
6Craven,R. G. , H. W. Marsh & R. L. Debus. Effects of internally focused feedback on the enhancement of academic self-concept [ J ]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1991, 83: 117-127.
7Freeman, R. & R. Lewis. Planning and Implementing Assessment [ M]. London: Kogan Page, 1998.
8Hounsell, D. Contrasting conceptions of essay-writing[ C ] // F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. Entwistle. The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1997.
9Ivanic, R., R. Clark & R.Rimmershaw. What am I supposed to make of this? The messages conveyed to students by tutors' written comments [ C ] // M. R. Lea & B. Stierer. Student Writing in Higher Education: New Contexts. Buckingham: SHRE/Open University Press, 2000.
10Lunsford, R. When less is more : Principles for responding in the disciplines [ C] //M. Sorcinelli & P. Elbow. Writing to Learn : Strategies for Assigning and Responding to Writing Across the Disciplines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997.
