期刊文献+

延迟转入冠心病监护室对非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征患者预后的影响 被引量:2

The effect of delayed CCU transfer on the prognosis of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者延迟转入冠心病监护室(CCU)治疗对患者预后的影响。方法回顾性分析因NSTE-ACS于急诊就诊的患者共664例。根据从急诊就诊到转入CCU监护的时间分为>12 h(延迟组)和≤12 h组(对照组)。记录所有患者到达急诊就诊到转入CCU监护的时间,记录所有患者的基本疾病特征、入院检查的血脂四项水平,以及两组患者是否采用PCI治疗的比例;所有患者入院时在急诊科均采用GRACE风险评分对患者的风险程度进行评估;结局观察指标包括患者行PCI治疗的比例,患者住院时间,住院期间病死率,住院期间的出血事件发生率、卒中发生率,记录两组患者治疗前和出院时左心射血分数(LVEF)。结果两组患者接诊时心功能Killip分级患者比例和GRACE风险评分分级的患者比例对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),其中延迟组患者住院期间行PCI的比例与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(x^2=1.178,P=0.278),两组住院期间的病死率、卒中比例对比差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但延迟组患者的住院时间和出血事件的发生率均显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组患者中包括行PCI和非PCI治疗的患者,两组治疗前和治疗后的LVEF对比差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 NSTE-ACS患者延迟转入CCU治疗(>12 h)增加了其出血事件的相关风险,并延长了患者的住院时间。 Objective To analyze the effect of delayed transfer of CCU on the prognosis of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome( NSTE-ACS). Methods A total of 664 patients with NSTE-ACS were retrospectively analyzed. According to time from emergency visits to CCU guardianship,the patients were divided into 12 h group( delayed group) and ≤12 h group( control group). The basic disease characteristics,blood lipid levels at admission and PCI therapy rate were recorded. GRACE risk score was used to assess risk level among patients at emergency department at admission. The hospital stay,mortality during hospitalization,bleeding events and stroke were recorded during hospitalization; and left ventricular ejection fraction( LVEF) before and after treatment in two groups were also recorded. Results There was no significant difference in heart function Killip classification or GRACE risk score at admission between the two groups( P〈0. 05). In delayed group,the PCI rate during hospitalization was significantly different from that in control group( x^2= 1. 178,P = 0. 278). There was no significant difference in the mortality rate or stroke ratio between the two groups during hospitalization( P〈0. 05). However,the hospital stay or the incidence of bleeding events in delayed group were significantly higher than those in control group( P〈0. 05). There was no significant difference in LVEF between the two groups before or after treatment( P〈0. 05). Conclusion Delayed engraftment of CCU( 12 h) increases the risk of bleeding and prolongs hospital stay in patients with NSTE-ACS.
作者 刘小艳 刘英 陈睦虎 LIU Xiao -yan, LIU Ying, CHEN Mu - hu(Department of Emergency, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan, China)
出处 《广东医学》 CAS 2018年第15期2304-2307,共4页 Guangdong Medical Journal
基金 四川省卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题(编号:17PJ127)
关键词 急性冠脉综合征 CCU ST段 出血 预后 acute coronary syndrome CCU ST segment hemorrhage prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献25

  • 1于子翔,马依彤.非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征介入治疗策略选择[J].心血管病学进展,2009,30(6):945-949. 被引量:1
  • 2赵明中,胡大一,姜立清,吴炀,朱天刚,郝恒健,张立晶,霍勇,王明生.早期有创干预对高危无ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征近远期预后的影响[J].中华内科杂志,2005,44(10):737-740. 被引量:9
  • 3吴泰相,刘关键.隐蔽分组(分配隐藏)和盲法的概念、实施与报告[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(3):222-225. 被引量:173
  • 4Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Assessing risk of bias in included stud- ies. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.0.0[updated February 2008; Part 2 Chapter 8.In:The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2008. Chichester, UK:John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  • 5Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronaryartery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study. FRagmin and Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease Investigators. Lancet, 1999, 354(9180): 708-715.
  • 6Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulas LA, et al.Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med, 2001, 344(25): 1879-1887.
  • 7Spacek R, Widimsky P, Straka Z, et al. Value of first day angiography/angioplasty in evolving Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: an open multicenter randomized trial. The VINO Study. Eur Heart J, 2002, 23(3): 230-238.
  • 8Fox KA, Poole-Wilson PA, Henderson RA, et al. Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non- ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Randomized Intervention Trial of unstable Angina. Lancet, 2002, 360(9335): 743-751.
  • 9de Winter RJ, Windhausen F, Cornel JH, et al. Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable Coronary Syndromes(ICTUS)Investigators. Early invasive versus selectively invasive management for acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med, 2005, 353(11): 1095-1104.
  • 10Mehta SR, Granger CB, Boden WE, et al. Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360(21): 2165-2175.

共引文献769

同被引文献13

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部