期刊文献+

瑞芬太尼用于妊娠高血压综合征患者剖宫产术中麻醉的安全性及对神经肽的影响 被引量:2

Safety Evaluation of Remifentanil for Cesarean Section in Patients with Pregnancy-induced Hypertension
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价瑞芬太尼用于妊娠高血压综合征患者剖宫产术中麻醉的安全性及对神经肽(NPY)的影响。方法选取2014年2月~2017年2月在某院行剖宫产手术的妊娠高血压综合征患者90例,随机分为观察组(瑞芬太尼组)及对照组(芬太尼组)各45例,分别检测患者麻醉诱导前(T1)、插管前(T2)、插管后(T3)、切皮时(T4)、胎儿娩出后(T5)的心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、血氧饱和度(SpO_2)及NPY水平,并观察胎儿Apgar评分及血气分析情况。结果对照组在T3、T4时HR、MAP水平明显高于观察组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);组内比较,对照组在T3、T4时HR、MAP水平明显高于其他时间点,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组1 min Apgar评分明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);与组内基础值比较,观察组在胎儿娩出后(T5)NPY水平明显降低,对照组在T3、T4时NPY水平明显升高,T5时NPY水平明显降低(P均<0.05);对照组在T3、T4时NPY水平较观察组明显升高(P<0.05)。结论在妊娠高血压综合征患者行剖宫产术中麻醉时,用瑞芬太尼能改善NPY水平,对母婴有较高的安全性。 OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety of remifentanil for cesarean section in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension syndrome and the effect of remifentanil on neuropeptide( NPY). METHODS 90 cases of pregnancy induced hypertension syndrome were selected from February 2014 to February 2017 in a hospital,45 cases were randomly divided into observation group( remifentanilgroup) and control group( fentanyl group). The patients were measured before induction of anesthesia( T1),before intubation( T2),after intubation( T3),skin incision( T4) after delivery of fetus( T5),heart rate( HR),mean arterial pressure( MAP),oxygen saturation( SpO_2) and NPY level,fetal Apgar score and blood gas analysis were observed. RESULTS The level of HR,MAP in the control group was significantly higher than that in the observation group at T3 and T4,the difference was statistically significant( P0.05).Compared with the control group,the level of HR,MAP in the control group was significantly higher than that in the control group at T3 and T4,the difference was statistically significant( P 0. 05). The 1-minute Apgar score in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant( P 0. 05). Compared with the underlying values in the group,after fetal removal( T5),the level of NPY in the observation group was significantly decreased,the level of NPY in the control group was significantly higher at T3 and T4,the level of NPY was obviously decreased at T5( P0.05).The level of NPY in the control group was significantly higher than that in the observation group at T3 and T4( P0.05). CONCLUSION In patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension undergoing caesarean section anesthesia,remifentanil can improve NPY level,it has high safety to mother and child.
作者 钱东红 刘新生 QIAN Donghong;LIU Xinsheng(Department of Pharmacy,Puyang Fan People’s Hospital,Puyang,Henan 457500,China;Department of Anesthesiology,Puyang People’s Hospital of Henan,Puyang,Henan 457000,China)
出处 《今日药学》 CAS 2018年第7期456-459,共4页 Pharmacy Today
关键词 瑞芬太尼 妊娠高血压综合征 剖宫产术 神经肽 安全性评价 remifentanil pregnancy induced hypertension cesarean section NPY safety evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献48

  • 1李崇华,朱春仙,贺晶.全身麻醉对剖宫产产妇分娩新生儿的影响[J].中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(3):162-164. 被引量:31
  • 2Van de Velde M,Teunkens A, Kuypers M, et al. General anaesthesia with taget controlled infusion of propofol for planned caesarean section : maternal and neonatal effects of a remifentanil based technique. Int Obstet Anesth ,2004,13 : 153-158.
  • 3Rme RM, Grange CS, Ainsworth QP, et al. General anaesthesia using remifentanil for caesarean section in parturients with critical aortic stenosis:a series of four cases. Int J Obstet Anesth,2004,13:183-187.
  • 4Kan RE, Hughes SC, Rosen MA, et al. Intravenous remifentanil : placental transfer, maternal and neonatal effects. Anesthesiology, 1998, 88 : 1467- 1474.
  • 5Draisci G, Valaente A, Suppa E, et al. Remifentanil for cesarean section under general anesthesia[J].International Journal of Obsteric Anesthesia, 2008, 17(2): 130-136.
  • 6Karagiannis A, Gallopin T, David C, et al. Classification of NPY-expressing neoeortical interneurons [J]. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2009, 29(11): 3642-3659.
  • 7邹雪芹,岳云,吴奇伟,张忱,柳娟.国人雷米芬太尼维持满意自主通气的EC50值[J].麻醉与监护论坛,2007,14(4):222-224. 被引量:5
  • 8American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstet?ric Anesthesia. Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American society of anesthesiolo?gists' task force on obstetric anesthesia. Anesthesiology, 2007, 106: 843 - 863.
  • 9Cyna AM, DoddJ. Clinical update: obstetric anaesthesia. Lancet, 2007, 370: 640 - 642.
  • 10Algert CS, BowenJR, Giles WE, et al. Regional block versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal outcomes: a population - based study. BMC Med , 2009, 7: 20.

共引文献57

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部