期刊文献+

分享经济下的协同消费:占有还是使用? 被引量:26

Collaborative Consumption in Sharing Economy:Own or Access?
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着分享经济的兴起,消费者获取产品和服务价值的方式,由传统的基于所有权的购买和拥有转变为基于使用权的分享和获取。这种借助互联网技术实现的产品和服务分享,被称为协同消费。然而国内针对协同消费的研究非常匮乏,不能适应分享经济发展的客观要求。通过对国内外相关文献的回顾,本文界定了协同消费的概念、类型和特征;依据自我决定理论解析了消费者参与协同消费的个体特征、动机和心理机制;基于流动消费理论,分析了协同消费给传统消费者价值和消费者与产品、品牌关系带来的冲击。在此基础上,本文构建了协同消费的研究框架并展望了未来研究机会。本文不仅在理论上整理了现有相关研究的主要观点和成果,提出了协同消费的研究框架,在实践中也有助于企业创新分享经济商业模式,吸引消费者参与。 Through the review of related literature, this paper defines collaborative consumption as the activity which consumers try to satisfy their interests, acquire and distribute products without ownership through modern information technologies and market intermediary in the organized system and network. Compared with the ownership-based consumption, collaborative consumption is a temporary and situational pattern. Consumers do not aim at the possession of products. In contrast to sharing, collaborative consumption is a market-based reciprocal exchange. Compared with the access- based consumption, collaborative consumption also includes the sharing of private property among consumers.
作者 卢东 刘懿德 Ivan K.W.Lai 曾小桥 Lu Dong;Liu Yide;Ivan K.W.Lai;Zeng Xiaoqiao(College of Business,Siehuan Normal University,Chengdu 610101,China;School of Business,Macao University of Science and Technology,Macao 999078,China;Faculty of International Tourism and Management,City University of Maeau,Macao 999078,China)
出处 《外国经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第8期125-140,共16页 Foreign Economics & Management
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71672120) 国家社会科学基金面上项目(17BSH125) 四川省"十三五"社会科学规划项目(SC17B077) 四川省软科学研究计划项目(2018ZR0124) 四川省教育厅人文社科重点项目(16SA0014) 四川省属高校科研创新团队资助项目(15TD004)
关键词 协同消费 分享经济 分享 使用消费 消费者动机 collaborative consumption sharing economy share access-based consumption consumer motivation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献150

  • 1贾良定,宋继文,李超平,崔荣军,陈永霞.领导风格与员工工作态度——互惠和信任的中介作用的实证研究[J].中大管理研究,2007,2(1):13-45. 被引量:16
  • 2李双燕,万迪防.(2008).互惠对工作要求--工作满意度曲线关系的调节作用.南开管理理论,11,103一109.
  • 3铩爽.C2010).员工互惠行为的结构及其相关研究.硕士论文,河南大学.
  • 4Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S., & Chen, Z. X. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 267-285.
  • 5Bian, Y. J., & Ang, S. (1997). Guanxi networks and job mobility in China and Singapore. Social Forces, 75, 981-1005.
  • 6Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.
  • 7Chen, Y. R., Chen, X. P., & Portnoy, R. (2009). To whom do positive norm and negative norm of reciprocity apply? Effects of inequitable offer, relationship, and relational-self orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4.5, 24-34.
  • 8Chen, Z. X., Aryee, S., & Lee, C.,(2005). Test of a mediation model of perceived organizational support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 457-470.
  • 9Choi, J. N., Sung, S.Y., Lee, Y., & Cho, D. S. (2011). Balancing cognition and emotion: Innovation implementation as a function of cognitive appraisal and emotional reactions toward innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 107-124.
  • 10Coyle-Shapiro, J., & Conway, N. (2005). Exchange relationships: Examining psychological contracts and perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 774-81.

共引文献455

同被引文献327

引证文献26

二级引证文献158

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部