GPPS结构性风险与声誉激励法权治理——兼同PPP比较

Research on the Possibility of GPPS Structural Risk and the Path of Legal Authority and Comparison with PPP

政府购买公共服务简称GPPS,是政府以定向委托、公开招标、邀标等形式,将原本承担的公共服务,转交社会组织、企事业单位履行,是政府与社会组织法治化合作治理的重要形式。狭义PPP与政府购买服务有交叉之处,但参与主体、适用范围、使用资金(还款)来源、预算管理和财务管理、采购方式、实施流程等方面均有区别。政府购买公共服务的法理依据、法源结构和法律关系与PPP不同,治理机制因而不同,重点构建声誉激励与诚信约束的法权治理机制,基于GPPS流程中的三方法律关系及潜在的结构性风险,凸显法益衡平价值,在时间轴与项目轴上,以多次合作模式形成政府购买公共服务的完全信息佚名博弈,阶段博弈的个体理性效果与重复博弈的策略均衡后果一致,该结构可应证多阶段非合作行为与单次博弈的理性合作契合,形成参与方声誉激励法权治理结构,具体通过增强市场机制效能、转变政府职能、完善GPPS体系的法权配置体系、增进公益治理与共享发展等方面,针对GPPS法权结构风险形成具体的预防措施。

In this paper,With corporate governance and the coupling relationship between the government purchase of public services,combined with the enthusiasm of incentive regulation,the principle of the double main body： the interaction of law,multivariate multicenter public-private cooperation and governance mechanism,analyses the legal basis for the government purchase of public services,source structure and legal relationship. On the basis of differentiation of GPPS and PPP projects,the government purchase of community home endowment service,social assistance system of government by law construction,government purchase labor training services and job training programs,for example,in-depth analysis of the economic law within the framework of the GPPS and PPP mode applications. From the government,the market main body and consumers tripartite relationship,analysis of GPPS process tripartite legal relationship and possible structural risk,from the social law interests in equity values,strengthen the market mechanism in the GPPS effectiveness,transform government functions;Improve the government purchasing public service system of social law system building,to the social law concept and system of scientific promotion,promote the development of social governance and public sharing,etc.,puts forward prevention and resolving mechanism construction.