期刊文献+

从知识论转向实践论:民主实践中代表问题研究范式的转型

From Epistemology-oriented to Practice-oriented:Transition of Research Paradigms of Representation Issue in Democracy
原文传递
导出
摘要 当下对代表及其相关问题的研究主要从两个方面展开:一是分析哲学进路,主要关注的是代表的定义,侧重以"代表"来解释"代表";一是史学进路,主要关注的是代表实践的历史传统,侧重展现代表实践的历史多样性。综合来看,这些研究普遍以知识论为取向、以求知为目的。然而,为了有效反映时代的民主精神、积极回应时代的民主要求,更有必要从民主实践论的角度、以求治为目的来对代表问题进行研究。这首先意味着应该从"选择"而不是"选举"的视角来理解民主实践中的代表。此外,还意味着:一方面,与"代表的定义是什么""代表实践有哪些历史传统"等知识论问题相比,有效解决民主实践中"代表身份的失真"以及"代表实践的质量"等实践论问题更为迫切和重要;另一方面,合理的代表实践不是基于代表的定义以及传统的代表实践经验,而是基于代表与民主实践的长期互动。在这些互动中,代表实践的有效性不仅能促进代表实践的合理性,而且能使代表实践与民主实践得以协调和统一。 The current research on representation and related issues is mainly carried out in two aspects: One is the analytic philosophy approach, which focuses on the definition of representation, explaining "representation" with " representatives". The other is the historical tradition, whose main concern is the historical tradition of representation practice, focusing on the historical diversity of representation practice. On the whole, these studies are generally epistemology-oriented with the purpose of knowledge quest. However, in order to effectively reflect the democratic spirit and respond positively to the democratic demands of the times, it is even more necessary to study the representation issues from the perspective of democracy theory with the purpose of seeking governance. This first means that representation in democracy should be understood from the perspective of "selection" rather than "election". In addition, it also means, on one hand, compared with the epistemological issues such as "what is the definition of representation" and "what are the historical traditions of representation practice", effectively solving the problems of "distortion of representative identity" and "the quality of representation practice" in democracy are more urgent and important, on the other hand, reasonable representation practice is not based on the definition of representation and traditional representation practice experience, but on the long-term interaction between representation and democracy, in which the effective representation practice can not only promote the rationality of representation practice, but also enable the coordination and unity of representation practice and democracy.
作者 樊凡 FAN Fan(College of Humanities and Social Development,Northwest A&F University,Yangling,Shaanxi,712100)
出处 《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第4期88-96,共9页 Journal of Shenzhen University:Humanities & Social Sciences
关键词 民主实践 知识论取向 实践论取向 代表实践 转型 democracy epistemology-oriented practice-orientated approach representation practice transition
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献33

  • 1赵汀阳.哲学的政治学转向[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2006,46(2):5-11. 被引量:24
  • 2石元康.《哈耶克论自由与法治》,载翟海源等编.《法治、人权与公民社会》,台北:桂冠图书公司,2002年,第62页.
  • 3霍姆斯.《先定约束与民主悖论》,载埃尔斯特等编.《宪政与民主-理性与社会变迁研究》,潘勤、谢鹏程译,北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1997年,第224页.
  • 4温格斯特.《自行贯彻的均衡与民主的稳定枉》,载布莱顿等编.《理解民主-经济的与政治的视角》,毛丹等译,上海:学林出版社,2000年,第4页.
  • 5温格斯特.《自行贯彻的均衡与民主的稳定性》,载布莱顿等编.《理解民主-经济的与政治的视角》,毛丹等译,上海:学林出版社,2000年,第3-43页.
  • 6诺斯等.《秩序、无序和经济变化:拉美对北美》,载布恩诺等编.《繁荣的治理之道》,叶娟丽、王鑫等译,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007年,第18-63页.
  • 7叶航.《导读:被超越的“经济人”与“理性人”》,载汪丁丁等编.《走向统一的社会科学-来自桑塔费学派的看法》,上海:上海世纪出版集团,2005年,第18页.
  • 8周光辉、龚蔚红、殷冬水.《为实现社会正义承担责任-社会公正与政府责任的理论研究》,教育部重大公关项目“社会公正与政府责任问题研究”最终研究成果,2009年,第99-120页.
  • 9(美)威尔·杜兰(WillDurant).文艺复兴[M]东方出版社,2003.
  • 10(意)但丁·阿利盖里(DanteAlighieri)著,朱虹.论世界帝国[M]商务印书馆,1985.

共引文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部