摘要
《最高人民法院关于审理医疗损害责任纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》聚焦了"诊疗损害责任"、"侵害患者知情同意权责任"和"医疗产品责任"这三种医疗损害责任形态。应纯化我国的医疗损害责任法。"诊疗损害责任"与"侵害患者知情同意权责任"在责任主体、归责原则和构成要件上具有同质性,异样的只是构成要件的认定标准。"医疗产品责任"不应存在于以"医疗服务提供者"为责任承担主体的"医疗损害责任"法之下。
Recently,the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Law in Case of Liability for Medical Damage focuses on three types of liability of medical damage.There is a need to purify the medical liability law.The liability for diagnosis/treatment and the liability for breach of informed consent have the elements of the liability in common.They only differ in the standards setting for those elements.The medical liability law should keep a distance from the medical products liability.
作者
赵西巨
高延东
ZHAO Xi-ju;GAO Yan-dong(College of Management,Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Jinan 250355,Chin)
出处
《医学与哲学(A)》
2018年第8期15-18,22,共5页
Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition
基金
2014年山东省高等学校人文社会科学研究项目(J14WB11)
关键词
医疗损害责任
责任构成
责任形态
liability of meclical damage
element of liability
type of liability