期刊文献+

草莓不同生长时期土壤微生物群落结构变化 被引量:3

Variation of Soil Microbial Community Structure at Different Growth Stages of Strawberry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为制定草莓的适时施肥计划提供理论依据,采用Illumina高通量测序平台对草莓不同生长时期土壤微生物的群落进行16SrRNA基因(V3-V5区)高通量测序,检测4个草莓不同生长时期的土壤微生物群落结构和丰度。结果表明:测序共获得有效序列数364 968条,OTU数38 124个,归属为10门(Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, Actinobacteria, Saccharibacteria, Thaumarchaeota, Bacteroidetes,WD272,Gemmatimonadetes,Nitrospirae)和其他未分类的单元;结果期土壤微生物群落的丰度值最大,特有的微生物种类也最多;优势微生物菌群为变形菌门(Proteobacteria)和酸杆菌门(Acidobacteria),生长期和结果期的优势属均为(Candidatus Solibacter),开花期和盛果期的优势属为副球菌属(Rhizomicrobium)。 The soil microbial community structure and abundance were determined by 16SrRNA gene (V3-V5 region) based on an Illumina high-throughput sequencing platform at four growth stages of strawberry to provide the theoretical basis for formulating the timely fertilization plan in strawberry production. Result: 364 968 effective sequences and 38 124 OTU obtained by the sequencing method belong to ( Proteobacteria, Aeidobacteria: :Chloroflexi: Actinobacteria, Saccharibacteria, Thaumarchaeota, Bacteroidetes: WD272, Gemmatimonadetes: Nitrospirae) and other unclassified units. The abundance value of soil microbial community and specific microbial species both are the highest at fruit-bearing stage of strawberry. The dominant microbial communities are Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria. The dominant genus of soll microbial community is Can didatus Solibacter at growth stage of strawberry but the dominant genus of soil microbial community is Rhizomicrobium at flowering and ful1 bearing stage of strawberry.
作者 宋宇 SONG Yu(College of Urban Construction, Eastern Liaoning University, Dandong, Liaoning 118003, (3zina)
出处 《贵州农业科学》 CAS 2018年第8期59-62,共4页 Guizhou Agricultural Sciences
基金 辽东学院校级基金项目"基于PLFA法分析草莓不同生育时期土壤微生物群落多样性变化"(2016YB001)
关键词 草莓 生长时期 土壤 微生物群落 高通量测序 strawberry growth stage soil microbial community high-throughput sequencing
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献144

  • 1朱晓超,吕锡武,付军,方华.臭氧消毒对饮用水中微生物生长的影响[J].供水技术,2007,1(1):24-27. 被引量:9
  • 2[1]Frostegard A, Tunlid A, Baath E. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 1991, 14:151 ~ 163.
  • 3[2]Frostegard A, Tunlid A, Baath E. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1993, 59 (11): 3605 ~ 3617.
  • 4[3]Andersson B E, Welinder L, Olsson P A, et al. Bioresource Technology, 2000, 73: 29~ 36.
  • 5[4]Yao H, He Z, Wilson M J, et al. Microb Ecol, 2000, 40:223 ~ 237.
  • 6[5]Schmidt I K, Ruess L, Baath E, et al. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2002, 32:709 ~ 720.
  • 7[6]Kelly J J, HaEggblom M, Tate R L. Soil Biology and Bio chemistry, 1999, 31:1455 ~ 1465.
  • 8[7]Lei F, VanderGheynst J S. Process Biochemistry, 2000, 35: 923~929.
  • 9[8]Maire N, Borcard D, Laczko E, et al. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1999, 31:1281 ~ 1293.
  • 10[9]Bentivega S P, Morton J B. Mycol Res, 1994, 98:1419 ~ 1426.

共引文献149

同被引文献57

引证文献3

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部