期刊文献+

中医基础理论教学开展形成性评价的心得 被引量:4

Experience of Developing Formative Assessment in the Teaching of Basic Theory of Traditional Chinese Medicine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文通过对中医基础理论课程作为中西医临床医学专业主干课程的重要性的综合分析,结合中医基础理论课程教学的教学团队、授课、课程安排等特点,分析在该课程实施"形成性评价"教学改革中所取得的成效以及存在的问题,并提出相应的解决方案。形成性评价将会进一步增强中医基础理论教学效果,巩固学生的中医专业思想和促进其思维的形成,同时对教师教学理念的改变产生一定的积极影响。 This article analyzed the importance of the basic theory of traditional Chinese medicine course as the main course of clinical medicine specialty of Chinese and Western medicine, Combining the teaching team, teaching, course arrangement and other characteristics of the basic theory of traditional Chinese medicine course teaching, the achievements and problems in the implementation of formative assessment teaching reform in this course was analyzed, and corresponding solutions were proposed. The formative assessment will provide new ideas for further strengthening the teaching effect of TCM basic theory, consolidating students 'TCM professional thinking and promoting the formation of their thinking, and at the same time it will have a positive impact on the change of teachers' teaching philosophy.
作者 张志敏 武志娟 宋兴华 谭玮璐 任培华 ZHANG Zhimin;WU Zhijuan;SONG Xinghua;TAN Weilu;REN Peihua(Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine,the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University,Guangdong Province,Guangzhou 510120,China)
出处 《中国中医药现代远程教育》 2018年第14期3-5,共3页 Chinese Medicine Modern Distance Education of China
基金 广州医科大学附属第一医院教育改革研究项目【No.2013P12】
关键词 中医基础理论 形成性评价 教学改革 basic theory of traditional Chinese medicine formative assessment teaching reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献35

  • 1刘声涛,戴海崎,周骏.新一代测验理论—认知诊断理论的源起与特征[J].心理学探新,2006,26(4):73-77. 被引量:50
  • 2Baston, T. The Electronic Portfolio Boom: What's It All about? [J]. Issue of Syllabus, 2002, 1: 1- 12.
  • 3Lockhart, C., & Ng, P. How useful is peer response? [J]. Per- spectives, 1993, 5 ( 1 ) : 17 - 29.
  • 4马道斯,斯塔弗尔比姆,斯克里文.方案的评价:历史的概观[G]//瞿葆奎,主编,陈玉琨、赵永年,选编.教育学文集(第16卷)教育评价.北京:人民教育出版社,1989:77.
  • 5泰勒.怎样评价学习经验的效用[G]//瞿葆奎主编,陈玉琨、赵永年,选编.教育学文集(第16卷)教育评价.北京:人民教育出版社,1989:263.
  • 6Scriven,M.The methodology of evaluation [G]//Tyler R.W.,Gagne,R.M.,Scriven,M.Perspectives of curriculum evaluation.Chicago:Rand McNally, 1967:39-83.
  • 7Bloom, B.S.Some theoretical issues relating to educational eval-uation[G]//Tyler,R.W.Educational evaluation:new roles,new means:the 63rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study ofEducation(part II).Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1969:26-50.
  • 8布卢姆,等.教育评价[M].邱渊,等,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,1981:230、259-260.
  • 9Black, P., Wiliam, D.Inside the black box: Raising standardsthrough classroom assessment[J].Phi Delta Kappan, 1998,80(2).
  • 10Crooks,T.J.The impact of classroom evaluation practices onstudents[J].Review of Educational Research, 1988, (58);Sadler,D.R. Formative assessment and the design of instructionalsystems [J].Instructional Science,1989,18 (2).

共引文献374

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部