期刊文献+

编码方式和线索显著性对前瞻记忆的影响 被引量:3

Effects of Encoding Strategies and the Salience of Cues on Prospective Memory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用2(编码方式:口头复述,书写)×2(线索显著性:显著,非显著)的混合实验设计,探究不同编码方式和线索显著性对前瞻记忆的影响。结果发现:不同线索条件下反应时的主效应显著,不论是口头复述还是书写编码,对显著线索的反应时快于非显著线索;不同线索条件下正确率的主效应显著,对显著线索的正确率高于非显著线索;显著性条件下编码方式正确率的主效应显著,书写的正确率高于口头复述。这些结果说明显著条件对前瞻记忆具有促进作用,书写和口头复述两种编码方式的作用只在线索显著时存在差异。 The mixed experimental design of 2 (encoding strategies: verhal rephrase, writing) x2 (the salience of cues: salient cue, non-salient cue) was used to explore the influence of diffeient encoding strategies and the salience of cues on prospective memory. It was found that the main effect of the salience of cues are significant. Whether it was verhal rephrasing or writing encoding strategy, the response to salient cues was faster than non-salient cues; the main effects of the salience of cues on accuracy are significant, and the correct rate of salient cues is higher than non-salient cues; The main effects of accuracy of encoding strategies are significant under salient condition, and the accuracy of writing is higher than verhal rephrase. These results indicate that the salient condition has a promo- ting effect on prospective memory, and the effects of the two encoding strategies of writing and verbal rephrase are different from each other when the cues are salient.
作者 胡锦慧 辛聪 陈幼贞 HU Jinhui;XIN Cong;CHEN Youzhen(School of Psychology,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou,350117)
出处 《心理技术与应用》 2018年第9期537-542,548,共7页 Psychology(Techniques and Applications)
关键词 前瞻记忆 编码方式 线索显著性 prospective memory encoding strategy the salience of cues
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献68

  • 1曾凡林,汤盛钦.言语的语言特征和听力障碍儿童的看话训练[J].中国特殊教育,1994(1):30-33. 被引量:3
  • 2雷江华,王庭照,方俊明.聋生唇读语音识别中熟悉效应的实验研究[J].心理科学,2005,28(5):1120-1121. 被引量:18
  • 3Block, R. A., & Zakay, D. (2006). Prospective Remembering Involves Time Estimation and Memory Processes. In: Glicksohn, J., Myslobodsky, M.S. Timing the Future: The Case for a Time-Based Prospective Memory (pp.25-45), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
  • 4Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (2005). Associating a time-based prospective memory task with an expected context can improve or impair intention completion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 345-360.
  • 5Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). Retrieval processes in prospective memory: theoretical approaches and some new empirical findings. In M. Brandimonte, G. O.Einstein, M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: theory and applications (pp. 115-142). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • 6Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield S., Shank H., Morrisette N., et al. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 134, 327-342.
  • 7Brewer, G. A., Knight, J. B., Unsworth, N., Marsh, R. L. (2010). Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection. Memory and Cognition, 38, 304-311.
  • 8Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Cook, G. I (2005). Task interference in time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions, Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 430-444.
  • 9Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
  • 10Kliegel, M., Martin, M., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2001). Varying the importance of a prospective memory task, differential effects across time- and event-based prospective memory, Memory (Hove, England), 1, 1-11.

共引文献31

同被引文献26

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部