摘要
我国刑事诉讼法确立了"事实清楚,证据确实、充分"的绝对确定的客观证明标准,但实践中却只能降格适用。2012年刑事诉讼法修改,吸收了英美法系中的"排除合理怀疑",作为"证据确实、充分"的补充,具有突破性的意义。在审判中心主义的诉讼制度改革背景下,遵循直接言词原则、证据裁判原则,需要对证明标准存在的问题在理论和实践中探索解决。
The criminal procedural law in China establishes the objective proof standard of "the fact is clear,the evidence is true and sufficient",but only in practice.The amendment of the criminal procedure law in 2012 absorbed the "reasonable doubt" in the Anglo-American law system,which was a breakthrough significance as a supplement to "the evidence is indeed and sufficient".In the context of the reform of the judicial system reform,it is necessary to explore and solve the problems in theory and practice in accordance with the principle of direct words and evidence.
作者
曹晖
CAO Hui(Department of investigation of Jiangsu police Institute, Nanjing 210000, China)
出处
《嘉应学院学报》
2018年第7期42-46,共5页
Journal of Jiaying University
基金
江苏高校哲学社会科学研究项目(2017SJB0461)
江苏高校哲学社会科学研究项目(2017SJB0454)
关键词
审判中心主义
排除合理怀疑
证明标准
judicial centralism
to rule out reasonable doubt
proof standard