后现象学与实用主义:可能会比你认为的更具相关性?

Postphenomenology and Pragmatism: Closer Than What You Might Think?

在这篇关于伊万·塞林格(Evan Selinger)《后现象学:对伊德的批判指南》一书的评论中,我将以卡尔·米切姆(Carl Mitcham)的观点为出发点,他认为唐·伊德(Don Ihde)的"后现象学(postphenomenology)","既对实用主义形成挑战,也受到实用主义的挑战"。我将以此为出发点,分四点对后现象学与实用主义似乎一致的地方进行讨论。然后,再列两点来阐述我所信奉的观点,即实用主义提供的方案比后现象学的更具有社会性(1)。

Carl Mitcham claimed that Don Ihde’s “ postphenomenology”“ both challenged and was challenged by pragmatism.” Starting from this point, in this commentary on Evan Selinger, s book entitled Postphenomenology： A Critical Comp）anion to Ihde, I discussed four points on which postphenomenology and pragmatism seemed to be in agreement, and then another two points were discussed to prove my view that pragmatism offered a program that was socially thicker than postphenomenology.