3Ayazi S, Hagen JA, Zehetner J, et al. The value of high- resolution manometry in the assessment of the resting characteristics of the lower esophageal sphincter. J Gastrointest Surg, 2009, 13: 2113-2120.
4Bredenoord A J, Smout AJ. High-resolution manometry. Dig Liver Dis, 2008, 40: 174-181.
5Bredenoord AJ, Weusten BL, Carmagnola S, et al. Double- peaked high-pressure zone at the esophagogastric junction in controls and in patients with a hiatal hernia: a study using high- resolution manometry. Dig Dis Sci, 2004, 49 : 1128-1135.
6Kim GH. How to interpret ambulatory 24 hr esophageal pH monitoring. J Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2010,16:207-210.
7Purl V, Felix E, Fitzgibbons RJ. Laparoscopic vs conventional tension free inguinal herniorrhaphy: 2005 society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons ( SAGES ) annual meeting debate. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20: 1809-1816.
8Kahrilas PJ, Kim HC, Pandolfino JE. Approaches to the diagnosis and grading of hiatal hernia. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 2008, 22 : 601-616.
10Fock KM,Talley N, Hunt R, et al. Report of the Asia-Pacific consen- sus on the management of gastroesophagea! reflux disease [ J ]. J Gas- troenterol Hepatol, 2004,19 (4) : 357 - 367.
