大学英语教学中形成性评价刍议——以动态评估为着眼点被引量：1

The Formative Assessment of College English——On Dynamic Assessment

下载PDF

导出

摘要教学评估是大学英语教学的重要环节,形成性评估对学生的学习行为起着至关重要的引导作用。动态评估是一种有效的评估手段,以评估过程中评估者的介入和评估者-学生之间的互动为模式,以探索和发现学生潜在发展能力为目的。在大学英语形成性评估体系中,引入动态评估可以使形成性评估的重要作用得以发挥,能够更有效地激发学生学习动机,促进师生互动合作,学评相结合,促进教学改革。 Formative assessment plays a significant role in directing students＇ learning behaviors. As aneffective method, dynamic assessment focuses on the intervention from assessors and assessor-learner inter-action, which targets on exploring and discovering students＇ potential development capacity. Combined withthe formative assessment in college English, dynamic assessment would better stimulate learning motive, pro-mote teacher-student interaction, furnish instant feedback andy, contributing to well-being of educational reform.

作者陈静 CHEN Jing(Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fujian 350001,China)

机构地区福建农林大学

出处《赤峰学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》 2018年第8期159-161,共3页 Journal of Chifeng University：Philosophy and Social Science Chinese Edition

基金福建省教育科学"十二五"规划2015年度常规课题"中国大学非英语专业学习者听力形成性评价实验研究"(2015CG1838)

关键词大学英语形成性评估动态评估 College English Formative Assessment Dynamic Assessment

分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献4

1韩宝成.动态评价理论、模式及其在外语教育中的应用[J].外语教学与研究,2009,41(6):452-458. 被引量：192
2孔文,方洁.另类评估的新发展:动态评估面面观[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2013,36(1):57-61. 被引量：42
3李丹弟.基于动态评价理论的英语语言学课程评价模式研究[J].外语界,2015(6):19-25. 被引量：42
4唐炜.外语教学过程中动态评价与教学策略研究[J].天津外国语学院学报,2004,11(2):71-74. 被引量：11

二级参考文献59

1Ableeva, R. 2008. Listening Comprehension in Foreign Language Instruction (CALPER Professional development Document 0810) [Z]. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University, Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Education and Research.
2Anton, M. 2003. Dynamic assessment of advanced foreign language learners [R]. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Washington D. C., March 2003.
3Brown, A. & R. Ferrara. 1985. Diagnosing zones of proximal development [A]. In J. Wertsch (ed.). Culture, Communication and Cognition. Vygotskian Perspectives [C]. Cambridge. CUP. 273-305.
4Buchel, F. & U. Scharnhorst. 1993. The Learning Potential Assessment Device (LPAD) : Discussion of theoretical and methodological problems [A]. In J. Hamers, K. Sijtsma & A. Ruijssenaars ( eds. ) . Learning Potential Assessment : Theoretical, Methodological and Practical Issues[C]. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger. 83-111.
5Calero, M. & E. Navarro. 2004. Relationship between plasticity, mild cognitive impairment and cognitive decline [J]. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 19 : 653-660.
6Elkonin, D. 1998. Epilogue. The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 5. Child Psychology [M]. New York: Plenum.
7Feuerstein, R., Y. Rand&M. Hoffman. 1979. The Dynamic Assessment of Retarded Performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device, Theory, Instruments, and Techniques [M]. Baltimore: University Park Press.
8Feuerstein, R., Y. Rand&J. Rynders. 1988. Don't Accept Me as I Am. Helping Retarded Performers Excel [M] New York: Plenum.
9Gibbons, P. 2003. Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom [J]. TESOL Quarterly 37: 247-273.
10Gould, S. 1996. The Mismeasure of Man. Revised and Expanded [M]. New York: W.W. Norton.