摘要
美国近现代陶行知研究主流范式,主要经历了由费正清为代表的冲击——回应模式到以巴雷基南、布朗为代表的中国中心范式的转变。通过从预设突破、中心边缘、协作还原视角切入,发现费正清和孔飞力的研究框架没有突破冲击——回应模式,布朗和巴雷基南的研究已经突破冲击——回应框架;美国近现代陶行知研究的中心边缘危险倾向以及其多学科协作研究思维。
The mainstream paradigm of modem American Tao Xingzhi research mainly experienced the impact of the re- sponse-representation model represented by Fei Zhengqing to the transformation of the Chinese central paradigm represented by Barrequilan and Brown. By cutting through the pre-set breakthrough, the center edge, and the collaborative restoration per- spective, it is found that the research framework of Fairbank and Kong Feili does not breakthrough the impact-response model. Brown and Barrekinan's research has broken through the impact-response framework; The dangerous tendency of the center edge of American modern Tao Xingzhi studies and its multidisciplinary collaborative research thinking.
作者
周伟
ZHOU Wei(Faculty of Education,Hubei University,Wuhan,Hubei 43006)
出处
《科教导刊》
2018年第23期6-8,共3页
The Guide Of Science & Education
基金
湖北省普通高校人文社会科学重点研究基地"湖北中小学素质教育研究中心"研究成果(项目代码:090-044035)