期刊文献+

极限工况下汽车正面碰撞事故损伤度预测 被引量:2

Prediction of accident injury severity of vehicle frontal crash under extreme conditions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为最大程度降低事故损伤度,以碰撞无法避免时的极限工况下车车正碰为研究对象,分析预测车辆碰撞事故损伤度的评价指标,采用正向推理方法建立车车全重叠及斜向碰撞前后速度变化ΔV预测模型,分析不同因素对碰撞前后速度变化ΔV的影响,将其影响关系与事故损伤度标准值关联,进而预测事故损伤度,并以实例验证事故损伤度预测方法。结果表明:当2车碰前相对速度与碰前夹角一定时,事故损伤度与2车质量比成反比关系;当2车质量比与碰前夹角一定时,事故损伤度与碰前相对速度成正比关系;在2车间碰撞无法避免的极限工况下,全重叠碰撞事故损伤度大于斜碰;司机应通过控制本车以较低车速、较小碰前夹角与对方车辆发生碰撞。 To reduce the crash injury severity of vehicle-vehicle crash to the maximum extent,the frontal crash under extreme conditions was taken as the research object. The extreme conditions mean there is no time for the drivers to avoid crashes. The evaluation indexes of predicting crash injury severity were analyzed. Then the forward reasoning method was used to build predictive models for velocity change ΔV before and after the full-overlapping and oblique crash. The model were used to analyze the influences of different factors on the velocity change ΔV. After that,the influence relationships were correlated with the standard value of crash injury severity to predict the injury severity. Finally,an example was used to verify the proposed prediction method of crash injury severity. The analysis results show that with a given pre-crash relative velocity and a given pre-crash angle between the two vehicles,the crash injury severity has a significant negative correlation with the mass ratio of two vehicles,with a given mass ratio and a given precrash angle,the crash injury severity has a significant positive correlation with the pre-crash relative velocity,that under the extreme conditions,the injury severity caused by a full-overlapping crash is greater than that by a oblique crash,and that before a crash the drivers can not avoid,they should control the vehicles' pre-crash velocities and pre-crash angle to the best of their abilities.
作者 王树凤 张大伟 刘宗锋 WANG Shufeng;ZHANG Dawei;LIU Zongfeng(College of Transportation,Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao Shandong 266590,China)
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第5期37-42,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 山东省重点研发计划项目(2016GGX105008) 山东科技大学研究生教育创新计划项目(KDYC16026)
关键词 道路安全 极限工况 事故损伤度预测 正面碰撞 速度变化 road safety extreme condition accident injury prediction frontal crash velocity change
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献56

  • 1王荣本,游峰,崔高健,余天宏.车辆安全换道分析[J].吉林大学学报(工学版),2005,35(2):179-182. 被引量:40
  • 2侯德藻,刘刚,高锋,李克强,连小珉.新型汽车主动避撞安全距离模型[J].汽车工程,2005,27(2):186-190. 被引量:50
  • 3公安部交通管理局.中华人民共和国道路交通事故统计年报(2011年度)[R].北京:公安部交通管理局,2012.
  • 4Kahane C J. Vehicle Weight, Fatality Risk and Crash Compatibili- ty of Model Year 1991-99 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks[ RI. Technical Report DOT HS 809662, DOT,2003.
  • 5Padmanaban J. Influences of Vehicle Size and Mass and Selected Drive Factors on ODDs of Driver Fatality[ C]. 47'h Annual Confer- ence, Association for Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Lis- bon, Portugal ,2003.
  • 6Jeremy J B, Paul S, Richard M M. Vehicle Related Factors that Influence Injury Outcome in Head-on Collisions[ C]. 52nd AAAM Annual Conference Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine, October, 2008.
  • 7Jeremy J B, Paul S, Richard M M, et al. Structural Attributes of the Striking Vehicle that Control Aggressivity Toward the Struck-ve- hicle in Frontal Collisions [ C ]. IRCOBI Conference, September, 2009.
  • 8Denis P W, Ciaran K S. Car Size and Injury Risk : a Model for In- jury Risk in Frontal Collisions [ J ]. Accident Analysis and Preven- tion ,2002,34:93-99.
  • 9Nusholtz G S, Xue J, Shi Y, et al. Effects of Different Vehicle Pa- rameters on Car to Car Frontal Crash Fatality Risk Estimated Through a Parameterized Model[C]. SAE Paper 2006-01-1134.
  • 10Stephen S, Aloke P. NHTSA's Recent Compatibility Test Program [ C ]. ESV Conference Paper 05-0278.

共引文献43

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部