综合护理干预对重症脑外伤术后昏迷患者压力性损伤发生率及预后的影响分析被引量：14

Influence of comprehensive nursing intervention on incidence of stress injury in patients with coma after severe brain injury surgery and prognosis

下载PDF

导出

摘要目的:探讨综合护理干预对重症脑外伤术后昏迷患者压力性损伤发生率及预后的影响。方法:收治重症脑外伤患者45例,随机分为对照组和试验组。对照组采用常规护理干预,试验组采用综合护理干预。观察两组干预效果。结果:试验组压力性损伤发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05);两组GCS评分均得到改善,试验组改善情况明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:重症脑外伤术后昏迷患者接受综合护理干预,可降低患者压力性损伤发生的概率,改善预后。 Objective：To explore the influence of comprehensive nursing intervention on incidence of stress injury in patients with coma after severe brain injury surgery and prognosis.Methods：45 cases of severe brain trauma were selected,they were randomly divided into the control group and the experimental group,the control group was given routine nursing intervention,and the experimental group was given comprehensive nursing intervention.Results：The incidence of pressure injury in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group（P〈0.05）.The GCS scores of the two groups were improved,and the improvement of the experimental group was significantly better than that of the control group（P〈0.05）.Conclusion：Comprehensive nursing intervention for patients with coma after severe brain injury surgery can reduce the probability of stress injury and improve prognosis.

作者叶小莉 Ye Xiaoli(Department of Thoracic Surgery,the People＇s Hospital of Yubei District,Chongqing 401120)

机构地区重庆渝北区人民医院胸外科

出处《中国社区医师》 2018年第24期128-128,130,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors

关键词重症脑外伤术后昏迷综合护理干预压力性损伤 Severe brain injury Postoperative coma Comprehensive nursing intervention Stress injury

分类号 R473.6 [医药卫生—护理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献3

1汤必群.综合护理干预对重症脑外伤术后昏迷患者压力性损伤发生率及预后的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践,2017,2(19):189-190. 被引量：25
2杨俊英.综合护理干预对急性脑外伤患者围术期抢救效果及预后的影响分析[J].实用临床医药杂志,2017,21(6):81-83. 被引量：18
3刘腾,杨少波,李昊.去骨瓣减压术在儿童重型颅脑损伤中的应用及研究进展[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2016,37(3):234-237. 被引量：12

二级参考文献58

1颜凤华,方响琴.颅脑损伤病人康复治疗中应用康复指导性训练的临床疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(12):3318-3319. 被引量：18
2Hawley CA. Reported problems and their resolution following mild, moderate and severe traumatic brain injury amongst children and adolescents in the UK. Brain Inj, 2003,17 (2): 105-129.
3Morrow SE, Pearson M. Management strategies for severe closed head injuries in children[J]. Semin Pediatr Surg, 2010, 19(4) :279-285.
4Stock A. Pediatric Head Trauma. In: Corden TE, editor. Medscape drugs, disease and procedures. 2011. Available from., http://emedicine, medscape, corn/article/ 907273overview [Last accessed on 2013 Sep 9].
5Montgomery V, Oliver R, Reisner A, et al. The effect of severe traumatic brain injury on the family[J]. J Trauma, 2002,52(6):1121-1124.
6Taylor A, Butt W, Rosenfeld J, et al. A randomized trial of very early deeompressive craniectomy in children with traumatic brain iniury and sustained intracranial hypertension [J]. Childs Nerv Syst,2001,17(3): 154-162.
7Ruf B, Heckmann M, Schroth I, et al. Early decompressive craniectomy and duraplasty for refractory intracranial hypertension in children: results of a pilot study [J]. Crit Care,2003,7(6) : R133-R138.
8Patel N, West M, Wurster J, et al. Pediatric traumatic brain injuries treated with deeompressive cranieetomy [ J ]. Surg Neurol Int,2013,4:128.
9Perez Sufirez E, Serrano Gonzfilez A, Perez Diaz C, et al. Decompressive craniectorny in 14 children with severe head injury: clinical results with long-term follow-up and review of the literature[J].J Trauma, 2011,71 (1) : 133-140.
10Noggle CA, Pierson EE. The path ahead: future trends in the assessment and treatment of TBI in the pediatric population [J]. Appl Neuropsychol, 2010, 17(2):123-124.