论案件质量评估制度对审判质效的影响

On the Influence of Case Quality Evaluation System on Judicial Quality and Efficiency

从设定的指标及其所欲评估的内容来看,案件质量评估制度是以案件处理的程序性形式结果对案件处理的实体公正性进行评估,并将该评估结果作为对法官、法院绩效考评的依据,由法院内部有权主体进行评估,这实际上是一种强管理行为。该评估制度可能会使法官对数字化评估指标的关心超过对案件处理实体公正性的关注。由于案件处理的实体公正性与评估结果的成本承担和利益享有在当事人与法官之间分属不同,因此可能导致法官及其所属法院为追求自身部门或个人评估利益,而使该评估制度对案件实体处理结果的影响更加复杂。在实务中,需转变评估绝对化的理念,科学设计评估规则,弱化评估规则中的利益化竞争,强化评估制度对案件实体公正的关注,并引入社会公众评价,以完善案件质量评估的科学公正性。

From the perspective of a set of indicators and assessment content,the case quality evaluation system is used to evaluate case entity fairness in the form of a case’s procedural results,and provides the assessment results the internal power subject of the court as the basis of performance evaluation to the judges and the courts. It is a kind of strong management behavior. This evaluation system makes judges more concerned with the digital evaluation index than with the justice of the case processing entity. Due to the difference of substantive impartiality of case processing and the cost burden and benefit of evaluation result between parties and judges,it may cause judges and their subordinate courts to pursue the interests of their own departments or individuals for evaluation,and make the impact of the evaluation system on the outcome of case entities more complicated. In practice,we must change the concept of absolute evaluation,design scientific assessment rules,weaken the interest-based competition in the evaluation rules,strengthen the attention of the evaluation system to the justice of case entities,and introduce the public evaluation,to improve the scientific impartiality of case quality assessment.