摘要
目的:观察Sonic Fill超声树脂用于老年人根面龋治疗的临床疗效。方法:选取98例老年患者共220个根面龋患牙,按随机数字表法分为3组,A组(n=74)用Chemi Fil玻璃离子水门汀充填,B组(n=73)用3M光固化复合树脂充填,C组(n=73)用Sonic Fill超声树脂充填;记录每组前磨牙根面龋充填操作时间,并于术后3、6、12个月复诊,比较各组临床疗效。结果:A、B、C组平均充填操作时间(s)分别为:474.38±3.76、358.94±3.23、235.44±3.10,各组间两两相比均有统计学差异(P<0.05)。术后3、6个月,3组间充填成功率无统计学差异(P>0.05);术后12个月,A、C组充填成功率(90.91%,93.31%)均高于B组(78.46%)(P<0.05),A、C组间相比则无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:Sonic Fill超声树脂修复老年人根面龋可获得良好的临床疗效,且操作简单,明显缩短临床操作时间。
AIM : To observe the clinical efficacy of Sonic Fill ultrasonic resin in the treatment of root caries for elderly patients. METHODS : 220 teeth with root caries in 98 elderly patients were randomly divided into 3 groups and were treated with C hemi Fil glass ionomer cement( group A, n = 74 ), 3 M light -curing resin (group B, n = 73 ) and Sonic Fill ultrasonic resin( group C, n = 73 ) respectively. Meanwhile, the filling operation time was recorded. Fill- ing effects were obverved at 3,6 and 12 months after operation. RESULTS: The average filling operation time(s) of group A, B, C was 474.38 ± 3.76,358.94 ± 3.23,235.44 ± 3.10 respectively( P 〈 0.05 ). At 3 and 6 months after operation, there was no significant difference in the success rate among the 3 groups (P 〉 0.05 ). At 12 months after operation, the success rate of group A (90.91%) and group C (93.31%) was higher than that in group B (78.46%) ( P 〈 0.05 ), There was no significant difference between group A and group C ( P 〉 0.05 ). CONCLUSION : Sonic Fill ultrasonic resin is effective and less time consuming in the treatment of root caries of the elderly patients.
作者
王晓钰
魏美荣
朱洪光
连宁
刘春春
白建文
WANG Xiao-yu;WEI Mei-rong;ZHU Hong-guang;LIAN Ning;LIU Chun-chun;BAI Jian-wen(School of Stomatology,Weifang Medical University,Weifang 261041,China)
出处
《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》
CAS
2018年第8期471-474,共4页
Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry