期刊文献+

论澳洲小说家对《浮生六记》的文化误读 被引量:1

Cultural Misreading and Literary Variation:From Six Chapters of a Floating Life to The Red Thread
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《红线》(The Red Thread,2000)是澳大利亚小说家尼古拉斯·周思(Nicholas Jose)致敬中国文学经典《浮生六记》的一部作品,因其"误读"中国文化而被指责充满了"东方主义话语"。本文以哈罗德·布鲁姆的互文理论为框架,分析《红线》对《浮生六记》的误读和修正过程;讨论跨文化小说的创作技巧、主题意义和跨文化作家的文化立场问题。 The Red Thread is an Australian novel inspired by a 19 th century Chinese literary classic. The intertextual relation between the two texts is self-evident for the story is embroidered with passages printed in red, quoted from the classic Chinese love story. The novel is well accepted in the west but is accused of an oriental discourse by Chinese critics for its misreading of Chinese culture. This paper takes a transcultural perspective and regards The Red Thread as a transcultural novel. In the light of Harold Bloom's intertextual theory, it analyses the rewriting process from Six Chapters of a Floating Life to The Red Thread and discusses the transcultural writing strategy, its thematic meaning and the cultural stand of the transcultural writer.
作者 张丽丽 Zhang Lili
出处 《华文文学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第4期39-46,共8页 Literatures in Chinese
基金 江苏省高校哲学社科基金项目"澳大利亚战后小说中的中国文化表征" 项目编号:2017SJB1222 南通大学横向基金项目"历史与虚构--莫理循故事的跨文本解读" 项目编号:2016092204
关键词 跨文化小说 尼古拉斯·周思 《红线》 《浮生六记》 文化误读 transcultural novel Nicholas Jose The Red Thread Six Chapters of a Floating Life intertextual theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献47

  • 1王腊宝.当代澳大利亚旅亚小说[J].外国文学研究,2003,25(5):147-152. 被引量:6
  • 2殷企平.谈“互文性”[J].外国文学评论,1994(2):39-46. 被引量:90
  • 3Jonathan Culler, Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction ( New York: Cornell University Press, 1981 ), p. 108.
  • 4John Frow, Marxism and Literary History (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1986), p. 128.
  • 5Julia Kristeva , Semiotike : Recherches pour une semanalyse ( Paris :Seuil, 1969), p. 255.
  • 6Julia Kristeva, La Revolution du language poetique ( Paris: Seuil,1974) ,pp.388 - 9.
  • 7[18]Harold Bloom, Poetry and Repression: Revisionism from Blake to Stevens ( New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976), p. 3,p.2,p.2.
  • 8[12][17][19][20][21]Harold Bloom, The Anxiety of Influence : A Theory of Poetry ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973 ), p. 43, p. 21,p.58,p.94,p.96,p.96,p.11.
  • 9Ann Jefferson and David Robey eds., Modern Literary Theory: A Comparative Introduction (London: Batsford Academic and Educational Ltd., 1982), pp. 1 - 15.
  • 10就笔者所知,韦勒克曾在三个地方探讨过文学史问题,参见 Rene Wellek, Concepts of Criticism ( New Haven: Yale Univeristy Press, 1963), 137 - 53页; Rene Wellek and Austin Warren,Theory of Literature ( New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,1977) ,252-68 页; Rene Wellek, "The Fall of Literary History", The Attack on Literature and Other Essays (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1982) ,64 - 77 页.

共引文献134

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部