期刊文献+

剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫妊娠阴道试产失败的危险因素及妊娠结局 被引量:4

Risk factors and pregnancy outcomes of the failure of vaginal trial delivery in scar uterus pregnancy after cesarean section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫妊娠阴道试产失败的危险因素及妊娠结局。方法回顾性分析125例阴道试产的剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫妊娠孕妇的临床资料,根据阴道试产是否成功分为两组。使用单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析影响阴道试产失败的危险因素,并对比两组的妊娠结局。结果 125例孕妇有95例(76.00%)经阴道试产成功,为成功组;30例(24.00%)未成功,为失败组。单因素分析结果显示,两组的年龄、产前BMI、子宫下段厚度比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄≥35岁、产前BMI≥30 kg/m^2、子宫下段厚度<3.9 mm是导致阴道试产失败的独立危险因素(P<0.05);两组的胎儿窘迫、新生儿窒息、产后出血、胎盘前置发生率比较,差异不显著(P>0.05)。结论年龄≥35岁、产前BMI≥30 kg/m^2、子宫下段厚度<3.9 mm是导致剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫妊娠经阴道试产失败的独立危险因素,阴道试产不会显著增加不良妊娠结局的发生率。 Objective To analyze the risk factors and pregnancy outcomes of the failure of vaginal trial delivery in scar urterus pregnancy after cesarean section. Methods The clinical data of 125 pregnant women undergoing vaginal trial delivery with scar urterus pregnancy after cesarean section were analyzed retrospectively, who were divided into two groups according to the success of vaginal trial delivery. The univariate analysis and multiple factor Logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the risk factors for the failure of vaginal trial delivery, and the pregnancy outcomes of the two groups were compared. Results Ninety-five cases(76.00%) of 125 cases of pregnant women were successfully in vaginal trial delivery, which were as successful group; and 30 cases(24.00%) failed, which were as failure group. The univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in the age, prenatal BMI and the thickness of lower uterine segment between the two groups(P〈0.05). The Logistic regression analysis showed that age≥35, prenatal BMI≥30 kg/m^2, thickness of lower uterine segment 3.9 mm were the independent risk factors of vaginal delivery failure(P〈0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of fetal distress, neonatal asphyxia, postpartum hemorrhage and placenta previa in the two groups(P〈0.05). Conclusion The age≥35, prenatal BMI≥30 kg/m^2, thickness of lower uterine segment3.9 mm were the independent risk factors for the failure of vaginal trial delivery after cesarean section. Vaginal trial delivery doesn't significantly increase the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
作者 杨青丽 YANG Qing-li(Baoji High-tech People's Hospital, Baoji 721000, China)
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2018年第24期151-152,共2页 Clinical Research and Practice
关键词 瘢痕子宫 阴道试产 妊娠结局 scar uterus vaginal trial delivery pregnancy outcomes
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献97

  • 1刘强,刘华倩,孙雪冰.子宫破裂的高危因素及诊疗现状[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2013,22(6):10315—10320.
  • 2傅才英,吴佩煜,翁霞云.妇产科手术学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2003:320.
  • 3Nishida R, Morikawa M, Yamada T, et al. Successful preg- nancy in a woman with uterine scarring by transverse fundal cesarean section[ J ]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2014,40 (5) : 1 420 -1 422.
  • 4Studsgaard A, Skorstengaard M, Glavind J, et al. Trial of la- bor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery [ J ]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2013,92( 11 ) :1 256 - 1 263.
  • 5Guise JM, Denman MA, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes [J]. Obstet Gynecol,2010,115(6) :1 267 -1 278.
  • 6Gilbert WM, Nesbitt TS, Danielsen B. Childbearing beyond age 40 : pregnancy outcome in 24 032 cases [ J ]. Obstet Gy- necol, 1999,93 ( 1 ) :9 - 14.
  • 7Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu A M, et al.Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: theWHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health2007-08[J]. Lancet, 2010, 375(9713): 490-499.
  • 8American College of 0, Gynecologists. AGOG Practicebulletin no. 115 : Vaginal birth after previous cesareandelivery [ J ] . Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 116(2 Pt I );450-463.
  • 9Landon M B, Hauth J C,Leveno K J, ei al. Maternaland perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor af-ter prior cesarean delivery [ J ]. N Engl J Med,2004,351(25) : 2581-2589.
  • 10Macones G A, Cahill A, Pare E, et al. Obstetric out-comes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries : Isvaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?[J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 192 ( 4 ):1223-1228.

共引文献207

同被引文献31

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部