期刊文献+

论民事级别管辖恒定 被引量:2

On Civil formalization of hierarchy-based jurisdiction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大陆法系的管辖恒定适用于事务管辖和土地管辖,立足于事务管辖和土地管辖不具有刚性和排他性。我国级别管辖恒定经历了从肯定到否定的立法转变,但否定级别管辖恒定的立法在我国现行环境下存有缺陷,涉及程序安定原则落实、诉讼拖延、实质变更中当事人诉权无法保障等问题。否定立法例产生的原因是我国未认知到级别管辖的非排他性和非刚性特征,其造成级别管辖实践中的混乱。为此,需要借鉴域外事务管辖恒定来重构级别管辖制度。建构审级管辖替代现有级别管辖中审级分工事项,矫正对于级别管辖性质的认识,将改良后的级别管辖作为管辖恒定对象。比照大陆法系事务管辖恒定的适用情况和适用条件,构建我国的级别管辖恒定规则。 The formalization of jurisdiction of continental law system is applicable to hierarchy-based jurisdiction and territory-based jurisdiction,which do not have the characteristics of rigidity and exclusiveness. On the formalization of hierarchy-based jurisdiction,China has experienced a legislative transformation from positive to negative. However,there are some defects in the negative legislation in the current environment of our country,including the implementation of the principle of procedural stability,the delay in litigation,the inability to guarantee the right of litigant in the substantive change. The reason for the negative legislation is that our country does not recognize the non-exclusiveness and non-rigidity of the hierarchical jurisdiction,which results in confusion in the practice. Therefore,we need to draw lessons from the formalization of hierarchy-based jurisdiction of Western countries to reconstruct the system of hierarchical jurisdiction of China. The concrete measures include constructing trial grade jurisdiction to replace the existing the trial level division in the hierarchy-based jurisdiction; correcting the understanding of the character of hierarchy-based jurisdiction; making the improved hierarchy-based jurisdiction as the subject of formalization of jurisdiction;and constructing the formalization rules of hierarchy-based jurisdiction of our country in accordance with the applicable situations and conditions of the formalization of hierarchy-based jurisdiction of continental law system.
作者 赵泽君 林洋 ZHAO Ze-jun;LIN Yang(Law School,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处 《学术探索》 2018年第8期81-88,共8页 Academic Exploration
基金 西南政法大学法学院学生科研创新项目(LX2017003)
关键词 级别管辖恒定 任意管辖 适用条件和情况 formalization of hierarchy -based jurisdiction arbitrary- jurisdiction applicable conditions and situations
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献17

  • 1李浩.民事诉讼级别管辖存在的问题及其改进[J].现代法学,1996,18(4):48-51. 被引量:29
  • 2冯艳.管辖制度有关问题研究[J].玉林师范学院学报,2004,25(4):25-31. 被引量:1
  • 3张晋红.诉的合并制度的立法缺陷与立法完善之价值分析[J].法学评论,2007,25(4):94-98. 被引量:11
  • 4柴发邦.《民事诉讼法学新编》[M].法律出版社,1992年版.第376页.
  • 5[日]兼子一著 竹下守夫 自绿铉译.《民事诉讼法》[M].法律出版社,1995年版.第15页.
  • 61999年8月1日最高人民法院颁布并实施.《最高人民法院批准各高级人民法院辖区内各级人民法院受理第一审民事、经济纠纷案件级别管辖标准》.
  • 7汪仁,陈红霞.“关于管辖权转移制度的思考”.http://www.rd.chengdu.gov.cn/ChengduRenda2/detail.asp?id=789.
  • 8张雪松.“诉讼管辖不再无视当事人权益”.http://www.sipo.gov.cn/sipo/zscqb/fzkj/t20020425_5233.htm.
  • 9李文广,孙邦清,杨剑.“《民事诉讼法》的修改与完善”.《人民法院报》2004年8月25日.
  • 10苏力.“上诉法院与级别管辖”.http://www.law-walker.net/detail.asp?id=3383.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部