期刊文献+

故意伤害罪缓刑适用情况的实证研究——以2016年重庆地区法院的判决为样本 被引量:2

An Empirical Study on the Application of Probation in Cases Involving the Crime of Willful and Malicious Injury——Sampling the Rulings of Chongqing District Courts in 2016
下载PDF
导出
摘要 司法实践中存在故意伤害罪的缓刑适用率比较高的现象,反映了缓刑适用中的不均衡、量刑情节不能对缓刑考验期的长短进行调节以及赔偿情节对缓刑的适用影响大的问题。造成上述问题的主要原因是对缓刑"情节较轻"的条件不清晰、法律对缓刑考验期的规定不完整和赔偿情节适用不规范。因此,有必要对责任刑限制缓刑的适用、完善缓刑考验期的规定、完善赔偿情节的适用加以规范。 The rate of probation applied to cases involving the crime of willful and malicious injury is found to be relatively high in judicial practices. This gives rise to the following problems: the application of probation is subject to disequilibrium; the senten- cing circumstances are not adjustable to the duration of probation; and the compensation circumstances have a great impact on the application of probation. The main reasons for the above problems lie in the fact that the conditions of "lighter circumstances" for probation are not clear, that the legal provisions on probation period are incomplete and that the circumstances of compensation are not standardized. To counter the above problems, efforts need to be made to limit the application of probation within the purview of liability penalty, perfect the provisions of probation test period and improve the application of compensation circumstances.
作者 古卫爽 张雅芳 GU Weishuang;ZHANG Yafang(Applied Law Research Base of Supreme People' s Procuratorate,Southwest University of Political Science & Law,Chongqing 400031,China;Law School,Southwest University of Political Science & Law,Chongqing 400031,China)
出处 《南都学坛(南阳师范学院人文社会科学学报)》 2018年第5期73-81,共9页 Academic Forum of Nandu:Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Nanyang Normal University
基金 2016年国家法治与法学理论研究项目"非羁押强制措施适用难题破解" 项目编号:16SFB2029
关键词 故意伤害罪 缓刑适用 实证研究 量刑情节 责任刑 crime of willful and malicious injury probation application empirical study sentencing circumstances liability penalty
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献27

  • 1何秉松.试论新刑法的罪刑相当原则(上)[J].政法论坛,1997,15(5):9-17. 被引量:6
  • 2陈兴良.禁止重复评价研究[J].现代法学,1994,16(1):9-12. 被引量:119
  • 3王明辉,唐煜枫.论刑法中重复评价的本质及其禁止[J].当代法学,2007,21(3):11-16. 被引量:34
  • 4[美]理查德·A·波斯纳.法律与文学[M].李国庆译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.
  • 5张军.刑事司法的和谐为民之路[A].人民法院改革开放三十年文集[C].北京:人民法院出版社,2008.27.
  • 6[法]米海依尔·戴尔马斯一马蒂.刑事政策的主要体系[M].卢建平译.北京:法律出版社,2000.242.
  • 7苏力.法律与文化[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2006.44.
  • 8[美]保罗·H.罗宾逊.刑法的分配原则-谁应受罚,如何量刑?[M].沙丽金译.北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2009.196,184-185.
  • 9Mark S. Umbreit. The Development and Impact of Victim - Offender Mediation in the United States [J]. Mediation Quarterly, vol. 12, no. 3, Spring 1995. Jossey - Bass Publishers. 272.
  • 10施海燕,施放.期望效用理论与前景理论之比较[J].统计与决策,2007,23(11):22-24. 被引量:18

共引文献47

同被引文献23

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部