期刊文献+

对比右美托咪定、咪达唑仑影响腹腔镜胆囊切除术全麻患者气管插管拔管期心血管应激反应的效果 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:总结对比右美托咪定、咪达唑仑影响腹腔镜胆囊切除术全麻患者气管插管拔管期心血管应激反应的效果。方法:设100例于我院行腹腔镜胆囊切除术全麻患者为研究对象,随机分为对照组与分析组各50例,分别给予咪达唑仑与右美托咪定全麻诱导与维持,对比两组气管插管拔管期心血管应激反应。结果:与对照组相比,分析组拔管时与拔管后1min血压、心率(HR)、收缩压乘积(RPP)等指标水平明显降低(P<0.05);对照组内可见较之诱导前,在拔管时、拔管后1min各指标呈升高趋势(P<0.05);且对照组升高更明显(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜胆囊切除术全麻治疗中,相比咪达唑仑,采用右美托咪定效果更佳,有助于减轻气管插管拔管期间心血管应激反应,安全性更高,具有较高临床应用价值。
出处 《北方药学》 2018年第9期42-43,共2页 Journal of North Pharmacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献70

  • 1陈敏,沈七襄,罗丁.瑞芬太尼镇静作用的临床观察[J].华南国防医学杂志,2005,19(3):47-49. 被引量:11
  • 2李晓红,张国庆,孙成英,李悦,杨宏,付景辉.全麻或全麻联合硬膜外麻醉下腹腔镜胆囊切除术病人心率变异性及血液动力学的变化[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(1):89-90. 被引量:37
  • 3IVANO FH, ROMEIRO PC, MATIAS JE, et ol. Comparative study of efficacy and safety between propofol and midazolam for sedation during colonoscopy[J]. Rev Col Bras Cir, 2010, 37(1 ): 10-16.
  • 4MULLER S, BOROWICS SM, FORTIS EA, et al. Clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine alone is less than propofol for conscious sedation during ERCP[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2008, 67(4) : 651-659.
  • 5SHUKRY M, MILLER JA . Update on dexmedetomidine: use in nonintubated patients requiring sedation for surgical procedures [J]. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2010, 15(6): 111-121.
  • 6GLASS PS, BLOOM M, KEARSE L, et al. Bispectral analysis measures sedating and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healty volunteers[J]. Anesthesio-logy, 1997, 86(4): 836-847.
  • 7CHEUNG CW, YING CL, CHIU WK, et d. A comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation in third molar surgery[J]. Anaesthesia, 2007, 62( 11 ) : 1132-1138.
  • 8CHANG C, UCHIYAMA A, MA L, eta/. A comparison of the effects on respiratory carbon dioxide response, arterial blood pressure, and heart rate of dexmedetomidine, propofol, and midazolam in sevoflurane anesthetized rabbits[J]. Anesth Analg, 2009, 109(1): 84-89.
  • 9COULL JT, JONES ME, EGAN TD, et ol. Attentional effects of noradrenaline vary with arousal level : selective activation of tha- lamic pulvinar in humans[J]. Neuroimage, 2004, 22 (1): 315- 322.
  • 10ARAIN SR, EBERT TJ. The efficacy, side effects, and recovery characteristics of dexmedetomidine versus propofol when used for intraoperative sedation[J]. Anesth Analg, 2002, 95(2): 461- 466.

共引文献168

同被引文献77

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部