语境约束条件下的结果妥当性——法律经济学视角中的“郑州电梯劝烟案”

Appropriateness of Results under Contextual Constraints: The Case of Anti-smoking Dissuasion in an Elevator in Zhengzhou Viewed from the Perspective of Law and Economics

郑州电梯劝烟案的二审裁判引起了广泛的社会影响和深入的学术讨论。法律经济学的视角可以提出、论证、解答该案比较独特的问题。该案在法律适用上并没有特别的创新,只有在特定的法律与社会互动影响的语境下,其价值和意义才可能得到有效的说明和阐释。从结果妥当性上,二审的结果完全符合法律的理想标准,即有效地引导未来的人的正当行为和塑造理想的社会秩序。但该种情况只是特例,不能创设一般性的规则。

The adjudication made by the second instance to the lawsuit caused by the anti-smoking dissuasion taking place in an elevator in Zhengzhou has attracted wide public and academic attention. If viewed from the perspective of law and economics, the case can be better established, analyzed and resolved. As a matter of fact, there is little innovation in the application of relevant law in the settlement of this case. Its value and contribution can be effectively exposed and explained only when it is put into the context constituted by the interaction between law and society. In terms of the appropriateness of the result, the adjudication of the second instance is well in line with the ideal criteria set by the law, i.e. to effectively lead people to reasonable act and shape the ideal social order. However, the settlement of this lawsuit can only be accepted as a specific case rather than a case from which a general principle can be established.