期刊文献+

中国与“一带一路”沿线国家BITs争端解决条款研究——以投资者与东道国争端为视角 被引量:4

A Study on Dispute Settlement Provisions in BITs between China and Other Countries along the Belt and Road: Focusing on the Disputes between Investors and Their Host Countries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "一带一路"是我国主动应对全球经济形势变化的重要决策。现实中,大多"一带一路"国家的经济发展与法治状况不佳,为中国投资者带来巨大利润空间的同时,也带来了各种风险和挑战。BITs是我国与"一带一路"国家最重要的投资协定形式,是保障我国海外投资利益的重要抓手。然而,由于我国BITs普遍签订较早、条款设计不够精细,因而与现实需求脱节。其中,投资者与东道国的争端解决条款存在的问题尤为突出,不利于我国投资者主张权益。双边投资条约中,争端解决条款对于维护投资权益具有决定性作用,因此本文在研究较为成熟的BITs争端解决条款及其实践的基础之上,对我国BITs争端解决条款的进一步改进、完善提出了相关建议。 The Belt and Road Initiative is a major decision China has made in response to global economic changes. In reality, most countries joining the initiative are relatively weak in economic development and rule of law. This not only provides Chinese investors with great profit margin but also brings them various risks and challenges. BITs (Bilateral Investment Treaties) are the most important type of investment agreement between China and other member countries and play a key role in protecting China's interests in making overseas investments. These treaties, however, lag behind the development of the reality because they were mostly signed at the initial stage of the initiative and the provisions are not well defined. Among the inadequacies, the most prominent one concerns the provisions for settling the disputes between the investor and the host countries, which is not good for Chinese invertors' assertion of their rights and interests. In BITs, the provisions for dispute settlement play a decisive role in protecting the investor's rights and interests. Therefore, in this paper we try to offer some suggestions for the improvement of such provisions on the basis of studying the relatively more mature dispute settlement provisions and their implementation in other parts of the world.
作者 刘沁佳
出处 《法治现代化研究》 2018年第3期51-62,共12页 Law and Modernization
关键词 “一带一路” BITS 投资争端解决 国际投资仲裁 投资者 东道国 Belt and Road Initiative BITs investment dispute settlement international investment arbitration investors host countries
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献26

  • 1刘笋.国际投资与环境保护的法律冲突与协调——以晚近区域性投资条约及相关案例为研究对象[J].现代法学,2006,28(6):34-44. 被引量:25
  • 2边永民.国际贸易与劳工保护的关系[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,27(11):66-71. 被引量:6
  • 3Meredith Kolsky Lewis, "Trans-Pacific Partnership: New Paradigm of Wolf in Sheep'sClothing", Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 34 (2011).
  • 4Meredith Kolsky Lewis, " Expan- ding the P - g Trade Agreement into a Broader Trans-pacific Partnership: Implications, Risks and Opportunities", AsianJournal of WTO & International Health Law & Politics, Vol. 4 ( 2009 ).
  • 5http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf,最后访问时间:2013年4月13日.
  • 6《2004范本》.
  • 7《技术性贸易壁垒协定》第3条第1款.
  • 8《2012年范本》第11条第8款(d)项.
  • 9《2012年范本》脚注14.
  • 10《2012年范本》第10条第1款.

共引文献27

同被引文献78

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部