摘要
目的比较中医三联疗法与常规疗法对2型糖尿病的临床疗效差异。方法选取2014年1月—2018年1月60例患者随机分为观察组与对照组,两组30例。观察组采用中医三联疗法:身体疗法,心理疗法,药物疗法。对照组采用常规疗法。治疗3个月后观察两组临床疗效及糖化血红蛋白的差异。结果观察组治疗后显效率为63.3%,总有效率为90.0%,分别优于对照组的16.7%,43.3%差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组治疗后糖化血红蛋白均有所下降但观察组显著优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论三联疗法治疗2型糖尿病疗效优于常规疗法,并能够降低糖化血红蛋白。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of triple therapy and conventional therapy on type 2 diabetes. Methods60 patients were randomized into an observation group and an control group, 30 cases in each group. The observation group adopted triple therapy of traditional Chinese Medicine: body therapy, psychotherapy and drug therapy. The control group was treated with routine treatment. After 3 months of treatment, the clinical efficacy and glycosylated hemoglobin of the two groups were observed. Results The effective rate of the observation group was 63.3% and the total effective rate was 90.0%, which were superior to 16.7% and 43.3% in the control group,the different was statistically significant(P〈0.05),after treatment,hemoglobin in both groups decreased,but the observation group was significantly bettcr than the control group(P〈0.05). Conclusion Triple therapy is better than routine treatment in treating type 2 diabetes and can reduce glycosylated hemoglobin.
作者
于畅
祁迪
YU Chang1, QI Di2(1.General Hospital of Heilongjiang Provincial Agricultural Reclamation Bureau, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, 150088 China; 2.The 205th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Jinzhou,Liaoning,Province 121001 Chin)
出处
《糖尿病新世界》
2018年第12期83-84,共2页
Diabetes New World Magazine
关键词
2型糖尿病
发病机制
中医三联疗法
Type 2 diabetes
Pathogenesis
Traditional Chinese medicine triple therapy