摘要
《今文尚书》佶屈聱牙,《古文尚书》平易晓畅,吴棫、朱熹对《古文尚书》的怀疑,主要是出于语言风格的差异。明代梅从语句、文体、史实及传授源流等方面抉摘《古文尚书》的作伪痕迹,和宋儒并无切实的证据相比,他的考据方法有了实质性推进。清儒阎若璩首先确立孔壁《古文尚书》为真实可信,然后将汉代文献记载中真《古文尚书》的内容与梅赜本对照,由根柢至枝节,全方位抉摘梅赜本《古文尚书》之罅漏。由宋至清,学者们筚路蓝缕,后出转精,最终使"《古文尚书》伪书说"成为学术定谳。
Song Ru＇s suspicion of Gu Wen Shang Shu is mainly due to the difference of language style. In the Ming Dynasty, Mei Jing extracted the false traces of Gu Wen Shang Shu from the aspects of sentence, style, historical facts and teaching sources. Compared with Song Ru＇s lack of tangible evidence, his method of examination has been substantially advanced. With the reference of Kong Bi Gu Wen Shang Shu, Yan Ruo Qu proved that Gu Wen Shang Shu was not true. From Song to Qing, the scholars research seriously, and finally got the correct conclusion.
出处
《中原文化研究》
2018年第5期108-113,共6页
The Central Plains Culture Research
基金
山东省泰山学者专项经费资助
上海市哲学社会科学一般项目"清华简与先秦<书>类文献研究"(2016BLS002)阶段性成果
关键词
《古文尚书》
朱熹
梅
阎若璩
Gu Wen Shang Shu
Zhu Xi
Mei Jing
Yan Ruo Qu
