摘要
针对生产期黄金矿山造价采用套取《黄金工业工程建设预算定额》单价法造价偏高、采矿单价组价困难和实物法编制人机消耗量远超实际消耗量等问题,某生产矿山通过在调查统计人工、机械、材料的消耗量和市场单价的基础上提出调查实物计价法。通过造价对比,生产期矿山利用调查实物计价法造价较单价法和实物法降幅在10%~32%,且能保证施工企业有7%左右利润,更贴近工程实际价格,针对性和实用性强,可供类似黄金矿山参考借鉴。
In the production period of gold mines, the problems such as the engineering unit price is higher than others by adopting unite price calculating method of "budget quota of gold industrial engineering construction", pricing difficulty of mining unit price and the consumption of man-machine actual consumption far exceeds the actual consumption, the investigating actual valuation method is proposed on the basis of statistics of labor, machinery, material consumption and market unit price. Through the comparison of cost, the cost of mining utilization survey in production period is 10%~30% lower than that of the unit price method and the physical method, and it can guarantee that about 7% profit can be obtained by the construction company, and it is closer to the actual engineering price. The method proposed in this paper is characterized by pertinency and applicability, which can provide reference for the other gold mines.
作者
王源
王荣立
Wang Yuan;Wang Rongli(Inner Mongolia Baotou Xinda Gold Mining Industry Co.,Ltd.;Zhongyuan Mining Co.,Ltd.,China National Gold Group Co.,Ltd.)
出处
《现代矿业》
CAS
2018年第8期59-63,共5页
Modern Mining
关键词
工程造价
单价法造价
实物法造价
调查实物计价法
Engineering cost
Unit price method
Physical method cost
Investigating actual valuation method