期刊文献+

以抄袭与造假而编织的一代进士名录(二)——对李桂芝先生《辽金科举研究·金朝进士名录》“比较”的回应

Lists Woven by Plagiarism and Forging of Successful Candidates in the Highest Imperial Examinations——A Response to“Comparison”in Mr.Li Guizhi's Lists of Successful Candidates in the Highest Imperial Examinations in Jin Dynasty-A Study of Imperial Exami
下载PDF
导出
摘要 这篇论文从"无据著录""重复著录""著录种种非金进士""著录事项颇多谬误"等四方面,揭示李桂芝先生《金朝进士名录》存在的系统性问题,以回应李桂芝先生检得"1825"名进士同薛瑞兆《金代科举》检得"1527"名进士之间的公开比较,指出该录缺乏金代科举及相关文献研究的学术基础与修养,涉嫌抄袭与造假。 To respond Mr.Li Guizhi's public comparison between his 1,825 successful candidates in the highest imperial examinations in Jin Dynasty and Xue Ruizhao's statistics of 1,527 candidates in Imperial Examinations in Jin Dynasty,this paper has revealed the current systematic problems from four aspects:record without basis,repeated record,record of those successful in other dynasties instead of Jin Dynasty,and various mistakes in record.It has pointed out that his record and textual research lacks the academic basis and achievement concerning the imperial examinations and the study of relevant literature.Therefore,his study is suspected of plagiarism and forging.
作者 薛瑞兆 XUE Ruizhao(School of Literature,Neijiang Normal University,Neijiang,Sichuan,641199,China)
出处 《内江师范学院学报》 2018年第9期37-43,共7页 Journal of Neijiang Normal University
基金 国家社会科学研究基金重大项目<中国历代登科总录.金代登科录>(03BZS008)
关键词 《金朝进士名录》 抄袭造假 比较 Lists of Successful Candidates in the Highest Imperial Examinations in Jin Dynasty plagiarism and forging comparison
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部