期刊文献+

供需双方信息不完全、交易费用差异与火车票市场扭曲——对“倒票”行为的交易费用分析 被引量:3

THE INFORMATION DIFFERENCE,TRANSACTION COST AND TRAIN TICKET MARKET DISTORTION——Analysis on Transaction Cost of Ticket Scalping
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文不认为供求不均衡是"黄牛"倒票现象存在的根本原因。本文针对火车票市场套利行为屡禁不止的热点问题构造动态博弈模型,论证了交易费用与套利行为之间的关系。模型通过对需求方购票的交易费用进行比较,逐层深入地分析了增加产品供给、增加购买渠道和差别定价等途径的效果,发现此类举措并不能有效遏制"黄牛"行为,反而还损害了低收入消费者的福利。研究表明,即使在供需均衡的情况下,供需双方信息的不完全,尤其是需求群体内部的信息不完全程度存在差异,会造成需求群体交易费用的差异,进而导致需求群体内部的资源配置被扭曲,而这才是"黄牛"群体长期顽固存在的根本原因。本文选取2002—2016年火车票贩票情况的真实数据进行了实证分析,印证了博弈模型的结论。而降低这种扭曲程度的同时降低需求方交易费用之间的差距,才是解决此类产品市场上资源配置无效率问题最有效的办法。 This paper considers the imbalance of supply and demand is not the basic cause of the ticket scalping phenomenon. We demonstrate the relationship between transaction cost and arbitrage behavior with a dynamic game model. Based on the comparison of consumers' transaction cost, the supply increase or price discrimination could not control the ticket scalping phenomenon effectively and it could harm the low-income consumers' welfare. The primary cause of the long-term persistence of the "scalpers" is the in- complete information and distorted resources allocation. This paper provides an empirical analysis with the data from 2002 to 2016, which confirms the conclusion of the game model. In general, it is the most effec- tive way to deal with the inefficiency of resource allocation in the markets of such products that reducing the gap of consumers' transaction costs.
作者 黄少安 阎晓莹 HUANG Shao-an;YAN Xiao-ying(Center for Economics Research,Shandong University;Economics and Management Department,North China Institute of Aerospace Engineering)
出处 《经济理论与经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第8期34-50,共17页 Economic Theory and Business Management
关键词 交易费用 供需不均衡 差异化定价 信息不完全 “黄牛”倒票 transaction costs supply-demand disequilibrium differential pricing incomplete information ticket scalpers
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献22

  • 1周异,康月霞.春运火车票销售的经济学分析与制度改进[J].湖南文理学院学报(社会科学版),2006,31(3):83-87. 被引量:16
  • 2制度经济学--社会秩序与公共政策.柯武刚,史漫飞.ISBN7-100-03093-5.
  • 3基于博弈分析框架的贸易摩擦制度经济学分析.湖南大学.黄萍,许漪.1002-6487(2009)22-0058-03.
  • 4薛兆丰.2001.《火车票价还不够高》,《21世纪经济报导》,2001年2月5日.
  • 5薛兆丰.2005.《要我写篇<火车票价还不够低>吗?》,2005, http ://www. stevenxue.corn/st_ 313. htm.
  • 6Atkinson, J. ,2004,"The Economics of Ticket Scalping", Working Paper of University of Notre Dame.
  • 7Bershad and Richard J. Ensor, 1985, "Ticket Scalping Legislation: A New Jersey Case Study", Seton Hall Legal Journal, Vol.9, 81--135.
  • 8Criscuolo, P.J., 1995, "Reassessing the Ticket Scalping Dispute: The Application, Effects and Criticisms of Current Anti-scalping Legislation", Seton Hall Journal of Sport Law 5, 189--221.
  • 9Diamond, T. A. , 1982, "Ticket Scalping: A New Look at an Old Problem", University of Miami Law Review 37, 71--92.
  • 10Elfenbein, D. W., 2006," Do Anti-Ticket Scalping Laws Make a Difference Online? Evidence from Intemet Sales of NFL Tickets", Working paper,Washington University.

共引文献22

同被引文献190

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部