期刊文献+

完整结肠系膜切除术与传统手术治疗结肠癌疗效对比观察

Effect Comparison on Observation Total Mesorectal Excision and Routine Operation for Colonic Carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 为比较研究完整结肠系膜切除术与传统手术治疗结肠癌的临床效果,将结肠癌患者100例分为2组,各50例。观察组采用完整结肠系膜切除术治疗,对照组采用传统手术治疗,比较2组手术指标、并发症发生率及复发率等情况。结果显示,观察组患者在术中出血量、淋巴结清除个数、肛门排气时间、住院时间及并发症发生率、复发率、生存率方面均显著优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.5)。结果表明,完整结肠系膜切除术治疗结肠癌临床效果更好,可将淋巴组织及其系膜最大程度切除,降低术后疾病复发率及并发症发生率,提高患者生存质量。 This study was to investigate and compare the effect of colonic carcinoma treated with total mesorectal excision(TME) and with routine operation, divided 100 cases into observation group( n = 50, re ceived TME) and control one( n = 50, adopted routine operation), then compared both groups' operative norms, complication incidence and recurrence status.As results, in intraoperative bleeding volume, the number of lymphnode removed, the time for anus flatus, hospital stay, complication incidence, recurrence rate, and survival rate observation group was all superior to control one( P 〈0.05).Results show that compared with routine operation TME for colonic carcinoma has better clinical effect, can resect lymph tissue and its mesentery at maximum degree so reduce postoperative recurrence rate and complication incidence, therefore enhance patient's quality of life.
作者 刘义凯
出处 《中国肛肠病杂志》 2018年第7期24-26,共3页 Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
关键词 结肠癌 完整结肠系膜切除术 疗效观察 Colonic carcinoma Total mesorectal excision Effect observation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献89

  • 1刘丽华,许秋平.28例腹腔镜下结、直肠癌根治术的手术配合[J].中国现代药物应用,2009,3(3):52-53. 被引量:16
  • 2乔唐,柏斗胜,徐永建.全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌——附168例报告[J].消化外科,2004,3(4):250-252. 被引量:5
  • 3赵东兵,高纪东,单毅,周志祥,袁兴华,吴健雄,邵永孚.结肠癌根治术后转移复发的特点及预后分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(4):291-293. 被引量:36
  • 4Storli K, Scndenaa K, Furnes B, et al. Improved lymph node harvest from resected colon cancer specimens did not cause upstaging from TNM stage II to III[ J ]. World J Surg ,2011,35 ( 12 ) :2796 - 2803.
  • 5West NP, Morris E J, Rotimi O, et al. Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival:a retrospective obser- vational study [ J ]. Lancet Oncol,2008,9 ( 9 ) :857 - 863.
  • 6Bamboat ZM, DePeralta D, Dursun A,et al. Factors affecting lymph node yield from patients undergoing colectomy for cancer[J]. Int J Colorecial Dis,2011,26(9 ) : 1163 - 1168.
  • 7Liang JT, Huang KC, Lai HS, et al. Oncologic resuhs of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgery for stage Ⅱ or Ⅲ left - sided colon cancers : a randomized controlled trial [ J ]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2007,14 (1) :109 -117.
  • 8Bemardshaw SV, Ovrebs K, Eide GE, et al. Treatment of rectal canc- er: reduction of local recurrence after the introduction of TME - experi- ence from one University Hospital [ J ]. Dig Surg, 2006,23 ( 1 - 2 ) : 51 -59.
  • 9West NP, Kobayashi H, Takahashi K, et al. Understanding optimal co- Ionic cancer surgery : comparison of Japanese D3 resection and European complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2012,30 ( 15 ) : 1763 - 1769.
  • 10Moore J, Hyman N, Callas P, et al. Staging error does not explain the relationship between the number of lymph nodes in a colon cancer speci- men and survival[ J]. Surgery, 2010,147 (3) :358 - 365.

共引文献237

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部