期刊文献+

比伐芦定用于老年AMI患者PCI术后临床效果及安全性分析 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨比伐芦定应用于老年心肌梗死(AMI)患者PCI术后治疗的临床效果及安全性.[方法]选择2015年3月至2017年12月本院收治的119例行PCI术的老年AMI患者,采用随机数字法将其分为比伐芦定组(n=57)和肝素组(n=62).随访受试者PCI术后30 d内不良事件及出血事件发生情况.[结果]两组TIMI血流3级、多支血管病变、支架长度等PCI术中相关资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05).比伐芦定组不良事件的发生率为10.5%(6/57)显著低于肝素组的25.8%(16/62),差异具有统计学意义(χ^2=2.022,P=0.025〈0.05).比伐芦定组出血事件的发生率为5.3%(3/57),低于肝素组的11.3%(7/62),但差异无统计学意义(χ^2=1.402,P=0.236〉0.05).应用Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,比伐芦定组无事件生存率显著高于肝素组,差异均具有均统计学意义(χ^2=11.042,P=0.001〈0.05).[结论]老年AMI患者PCI术后应用比伐芦定抗凝,可有效降低患者术后30 d内主要终点事件发生率,同时不增加出血风险,安全性较高.
出处 《医学临床研究》 CAS 2018年第8期1551-1553,共3页 Journal of Clinical Research
基金 北京力生心血管康复健康基金会领航基金课题(NO.LHJJ20155029)
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献59

  • 1Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37 (3) : 267-315. DOI: 10. 1016/j. rec. 2015. 10. 009.
  • 2Nabi F, Chang SM, Xu J, et al. Assessing risk in acute chest pain : The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department [ J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, 19 (2): 233-243. DOI: 10. 1007/s12350-011-9484-7.
  • 3Shah BN, Balaji G, Alhajiri A, et al. Incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of contemporary stress echocardiography in a chest pain unit: mortality and morbidity outcomes from a real-world setting [J]. Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6 (2): 202-209. DOI: 10. ll61/CIRCIMAGING. 112. 980797.
  • 4Huhen E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in theemergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2013, 61 (8): 880- 892. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jacc. 2009. 02. 008.
  • 5Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a 0-hour/l-hour algorithm in the diagnosis ofmyocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [ J ]. Ann Emerg Med, 2016, pii: S0196-0644 (15) 01501-2. DOI: 10. 1016/j. annemergrned. 2015. 11. 013.
  • 6Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B, et al. One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2012, 172 (16) : 1211-1218. DOI: 10. 1001/archintemmed. 2012. 3698.
  • 7Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation [J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33 (20) : 2569-2619. DOI: 10. 1093/eurheartj/ehs215.
  • 8Fox KA, Fitzgerald G, Puymirat E, et al. Should patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score [J]. BMJ Open, 2014, 4 (2): e4425. DOI: 10. 1136/bmjopen-2013-O04425.
  • 9Abu-Assi E, Raposeiras-Roubin S, Iear P, et al. Comparing the predictive validity of three contemporary bleeding risk scores in acute coronary syndrome [J]. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 2012, 1 (3): 222-231. DOI: 10. 1177/2048872612453924.
  • 10Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 361 (11): 1045-1057. DOI: 10. 1056/ NEJMoa0904327.

共引文献571

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部