用无张力疝修补术与传统疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的效果比较

The effect of tension-free herniorrhaphy and traditional herniorrhaphy in treating inguinal hernia was compared

目的:比较用无张力疝修补术与传统疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的效果。方法:将2014年11月至2016年11月成都市青羊区文家社区卫生服务中心收治的104例腹股沟疝患者分为传统组和研究组,每组各52例患者。对传统组患者实施传统疝修补术进行治疗。对研究组患者实施无张力疝修补术。然后,比较两组患者发生术后并发症的情况、疗效、手术的时间及住院的时间。结果:研究组患者术后并发症的发生率低于传统组患者,其治疗的总有效率高于传统组患者,其手术的时间及住院的时间均短于传统组患者(P<0.05)。结论:与用传统疝修补术相比,用无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的效果较好,可降低患者术后并发症的发生率,缩短其住院的时间。

objective： to compare the efficacy of tension-free herniorrhaphy with traditional herniorrhaphy in the treatment of inguinal hernia. Methods： 104 patients with inguinal hernia admitted to wenjia community health service center in qingyang district of chengdu from November 2014 to November 2016 were divided into traditional group and research group, with 52 patients in each group. Traditional herniorrhaphy was performed in the traditional group. Tension-free hernia repair was performed in the study group. Then, the two groups were compared for postoperative complications, curative effect, time of surgery and time of hospitalization. Results： the incidence of postoperative complications in the study group was lower than that in the traditional group, and the total treatment efficiency was higher than that in the traditional group, and the duration of surgery and hospitalization was shorter than that in the traditional group（P〈0.05）. Conclusion： compared with conventional herniorrhaphy, tension-free herniorrhaphy is effective in treating inguinal hernia, reducing the incidence of postoperative complications and shortening the length of hospitalization.