期刊文献+

基于“SEC”模式的高考数学试题与课程标准的一致性研究——以2017年全国统一考试课标Ⅱ理科数学为例 被引量:8

The Analysis of Consistency about the Curriculum Standards and the National Matriculation Test of Mathematics Based on the SEC Model: Taking National Matriculation Test of Mathematics Ⅱ( Science) in 2017 as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用"SEC"一致性分析模式,分别从内容主题、认知水平两个维度对2017年普通高等学校招生全国统一考试课标Ⅱ理科数学试题与课程标准的一致性进行分析。结果表明:该卷试题与课程标准的一致性程度一般,内容主题与认知水平的考查力度均与课程标准存在一定的差异。需要重新审视试卷的结构,以充分发挥高考试题对课程教学的导向作用,全方位落实数学课程标准的基本理念。 The academic evaluation should be carried out tightly around the standards of the curriculum. The consistency analysis can be used to help to detect and analyze whether the test evaluation in the scope of the course is moderate or not. The paper analyzes the consistency between the curriculum standard and the 2017 national college entrance examination mathematics Ⅱ( Science) in two perspectives,the content subject and the cognitive level,with adopting the SEC consistency analysis model. The results show that the degree of consistency between the course standard and the volume of the examination paper is medium,and the test degree between the content subject and the cognitive level are different from the curriculum standard. It is necessary to reconsider the structure of the examination paper,in order to give a full play to the guiding role of the high test question in the course teaching,and implement the basic concept of mathematics curriculum standard in all aspects.
作者 张定强 裴阳 Zhang Dingqiang;Pei Yang(Educational Institute of Northwest Normal University,Gansu,Lanzhou,73007)
出处 《考试研究》 2018年第4期9-15,共7页 Examinations Research
基金 教育部教师司2013年度项目"创新教师培养模式"(06-138-PY)
关键词 课程标准 高考数学 一致性 SEC模式 Curriculum Standards National Matriculation Test of Mathematics Consistency SEC Model
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献14

  • 1刘学智,马云鹏.美国“SEC”一致性分析范式的诠释与启示——基础教育中评价与课程标准一致性的视角[J].比较教育研究,2007,28(5):64-68. 被引量:89
  • 2Norman,L.Webb. Aligument of Science and Maths Standards and Assessments in Four States. Council of Chief State School Officers. Washington,DC August, 1999.23.
  • 3U.S.Congress.House of Representatives. Improving Americans Schools.Act.Washington. DC:U.S. Government Printing Office. 1994. 8.
  • 4Porter.How SEC.Measures Alignment.Educational Researcher, 1997(5):2,12,9,5,8.
  • 5Norman L.Webb. Criteria for Ahgnment of Expectation and Asses Sment in Maths and Science Education. Washington. DC :National Institute for Science Education University of Wisconsin- Madison and Council of Chief State School Officers, 1997.14-22.
  • 6Porter, A. C. Creating a System of School Process Indicators.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1991, (1): 29.
  • 7Porter A C.Measuring the Content of Instruction:Uses in Re- search and Practice [J].Educational Researcher, 2002,31 ( 7 ) : 3-14.
  • 8Xiufeng Liu, Baohui Zhang, Ling L.Liang, Gavin Fulmer, Beau- mie Kim, Haiquan Yuan.Alignment between the Physics Content Standard and the Standardized Test: A Comparison among the United States-New York State,Singapore,and China-Jiangsu [J].Science Education, 2009,93 ( 5 ) : 777.797.
  • 9雷新勇.基于标准的教育改革背景下学业水平考试内容改革的思考[J].上海教育科研,2008(8):12-16. 被引量:13
  • 10陈娴,郏璨璨,陈宁.物理内容标准与考试之间的一致性研究[J].课程.教材.教法,2010,30(7):67-71. 被引量:18

共引文献101

同被引文献46

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部