期刊文献+

倾向得分匹配法对两种方法治疗子宫肌瘤的疗效再评价及复发相关因素分析 被引量:4

Reevaluation of the efficacy of two methods in the treatment of uterine fibroids using propensity score matching method and analysis of the recurrence related factors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术(laparoscopic myomectomy,LM)与开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术(transabdominal myomectomy,TAM)的疗效,分析其术后复发的危险因素。方法:回顾分析2015年8月至2016年3月行LM与TAM的119例患者的临床资料,其中72例行LM,47例行TAM。肌瘤位置为肌壁间、浆膜下。采用倾向得分匹配法(propensity score matching,PSM)均衡组间混杂因素的影响,比较匹配后两组患者术后情况,并分析术后复发的危险因素。结果:经PSM获得43对患者,基线资料组间分布均衡。LM组住院时间、术后疼痛评分、术后排气时间均优于TAM组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术中出血量、2年复发率差异无统计学意义。术后2年共26例复发,logistic回归分析显示,肿瘤数量≥4是术后肿瘤复发的危险因素。结论:应用PSM可有效提高非随机资料组间协变量的均衡性,并对子宫肌瘤切除术的疗效做出正确评价。LM患者能更快地从手术中恢复,术后2年内复发率与TAM基本一致;肿瘤数量≥4是术后肿瘤复发的危险因素。 Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic myomectomy( LM) and transabdominal myomectomy( TAM),and to analyze the risk factors of postoperative recurrence.Methods: Clinical data of 119 patients who underwent LM or TAM from Aug.2015 to Mar.2016 were retrospectively analyzed,including 72 patients with LM and 47 patients with TAM.The location of myoma was intramural and subserous.Propensity score matching( PSM) was used to balance the influence of intergroup confounding factors,and the postoperative conditions of the two groups were compared,and the risk factors of postoperative recurrence were analyzed.Results: Fortythree patients were obtained after PSM,and all baseline data were evenly distributed between the two groups.The time of hospitalization,visual analogue score of postoperative pain and postoperative exhaust time of group LM were superior to those of group TAM,and the difference was statistically significant( P0.05).There was no significant difference in intraoperative bleeding or 2-year recurrence rate after operation between the two groups. There were 26 relapses in 2 years after operation. Logistic regression analysis showed that the number of tumors ≥4 was a risk factor for postoperative recurrence. Conclusions: The application of PSM can effectively improve the balance of covariates among non-randomized data groups,thus can make a correct evaluation of the efficacy of hysteromyomectomy.The patients with LM can recover faster from the operation,and the recurrence rate within 2 years after the operation is basically the same as TAM,and the number of tumors ≥4 is the risk factor for postoperative tumor recurrence.
作者 陈慧 余艳萍 王永莉 林清兰 CHEN Hui;YU Yan-ping;WANG Yong-li(Maternal and Child Center,Xiaolan Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University,Zhongshan 528415,China)
出处 《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2018年第7期543-546,共4页 Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
关键词 倾向得分匹配法 子宫肌瘤 治疗结果 复发 腹腔镜检查 剖腹术 因素分析 统计学 Propensity score matching Uterine fibroids Treatment outcome Recurrence Laparoscopy Laparotomy Factor analysis statistical
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献30

  • 1Austin PC.A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.Stat Med,2008,27:2037-2049.
  • 2Austin PC,Grootendorst P,Anderson GM.A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects:a Monte Carlo study.Stat Med,2007,26:734-753.
  • 3Rosenbaum PR,Rubin DB.The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects.Biometrika,1983,70:41-55.
  • 4Katherine HH,Thomas AL.Propensity score modeling strategies for the causal analysis of observational data.Biostatistics,2002,2:179-193.
  • 5Austin PC,Mamdanil MM.A comparison of propensity score methods:a case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use.Stat Med,2006,25:2084-2106.
  • 6Ekundayo OJ,Adamopoulos C,Ahmed MI,et al.Oral potassium supplement use and outcomes in chronic heart failure:a propensity-matched study.Int J Cardiol,2009.
  • 7D'Agostino RB.Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.Stat Med,1998,17:2265-2281.
  • 8Brookhart MA,Schneeweiss S,Rothman KJ,et al.Variable selection for propensity score models.Prac Epidemiol,2006,163:1149-1156.
  • 9Perkins SM,Tu W,Underhill MG,et al.The use of propensity scores in pharmacoepidemioiogic research.Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Safety,2000,9:93-101.
  • 10Sturmer T,Joshi M,Glynn RJ,et al.A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use,advantages in specific settings,but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods.J Clin Epidemiol,2006,59:437-447.

共引文献426

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部