期刊文献+

碳关税与WTO规则的适应关系及中国应对 被引量:3

The Accommodation of Carbon Tariff to WTO Rules and China's Response to Their Incompatibility
下载PDF
导出
摘要 碳关税的本质是以环境保护为名的单边贸易保护措施,能够形成新的贸易壁垒,阻止他国产品进入本国市场。但是,碳关税措施与WTO的非歧视原则存在冲突,援引环境例外规则亦存在困难,因此并不具有合法性。中国可以从国际法和国内法两个方面应对未来可能面临的碳关税问题,一方面在国际气候合作中坚决主张排放权是一种发展权;另一方面应积极推进国内减排政策及碳交易市场建设法律体系的完善。 The essence of carbon tariffs is a unilateral trade protective measure in the name of environmental protection. Carbon tariffs can create new trade barriers and prevent other countries' products from entering the domestic market. However, carbon tariffs measures are in conflict with the WTO's non-discrimination principles. And it is difficult to invoke Environmental Exclusion Clause. Therefore it is illegitimacy. China can deal with the issue of carbon tariffs that may be faced in the future from two aspects the international and domestic law. On the one hand, China should firmly advocate that carbon emission right is a right to development in international climate cooperation. On the other hand, China should positively promote the improvement of domestic emission reduction policies and the legal system for carbon trading market construction.
作者 姜明 JIANG Ming(School of Humanities and Laws,Changsha University of Science and Technology University,Changsha,Hunan 410114,China)
出处 《长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2018年第5期102-111,共10页 Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology:Social Science
基金 教育部人文社科规划项目(13YJC820036)
关键词 碳关税 WTO规则 碳泄漏 carbon tariff WTO rules carbon leakage
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献58

  • 1Liang Q. M., Fan Y., Wei Y. M.Carbon Taxation Policy in China: How to Protect Energy-and Trade-intensive Sectors[J]. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2007,29:311-333.
  • 2Toh M. H., Lin Q. An Evaluation of the 1994 Tax Reform in China using a General Equilibrium Model [J]. China Economic Review, 2005,16:246-270.
  • 3McFarland J. R., Reilly J. M. and Herzog H. J. Representing Energey Technologies in Top-down Economic Models Using Bot- tom-up Information[J]. Energy Economics, 2004,26:685-707.
  • 4Horridge M., Wittwer G. SinoTERM, A Multi-regional CGE Model of China[J]. China Economic Review, 2008,19:628-634.
  • 5Fullerton D., Heutel G. The General Equilibrium Incidence of Environmental Taxes. NBER working paper, No. 11311, 2009.
  • 6Lockwood B., Whalley J. Carbon Motivated Border Tax Adjustments: Old Wine in Green Bottles? NBER Working Paper, No. 14025, 2008.
  • 7Cai Y. Z., Riezman R., Whalley J. International Trade and the Negotiability of Global Climate Change Agreements. NBER Working Paper, No. 14711, 2009.
  • 8Chatterji S., Ghosal S., Walsh S., et al. Unilateral Measures and Emissions Mitigation. NBER Working Paper, No. 15441, 2009.
  • 9Dong Y. and Whalley J. Carbon, Trade Policy, and Carbon Free Trade Areas. NBER Working Paper, No. 14431, 2008.
  • 10Gros D. Global Welfare Implications of Carbon Border Taxes. CESIFO Working Paper, No.2790, 2009.

共引文献189

同被引文献60

引证文献3

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部