期刊文献+

反恐行政认定行为的不可诉性商榷 被引量:3

On the Non-justiciability of Anti-Terrorism Administrative Confirmation
原文传递
导出
摘要 《中华人民共和国反恐怖主义法》将国家反恐怖主义工作领导机构做出的反恐行政认定行为规定为不可诉行为的做法值得商榷。从行为性质来分析,反恐行政认定行为不属于国家行为,也不符合终局行政裁决行为的法律特征,而是一种影响被认定的恐怖活动组织和人员的权利或义务的行政确认行为,理应具有可诉性。将反恐行政认定行为规定为不可诉行为与诸多域外奉行反恐行政认定模式国家的立(司)法例相背,也不符合该项制度的现实与未来发展趋势之所需。立法者应当适时修改《反恐怖主义法》相关条款,将反恐行政认定行为纳入司法审查范围,作为可诉行为来对待。 The Anti-terrorism Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that the anti-ter rorism administrative confirmation made by the anti-terrorist agencies is non-justiciable. However, the anti-terrorism administrative confirmation is neither a state action nor a final administrative adjudi cation. In fact, the anti-terrorism administrative confirmation is a administrative action that can influ ence the rights and obligations of the recognized terrorist organizations and personnel and it should be jus ticiable. The Chinese law that defines the anti-terrorism administrative confirmation as non is different from many countries around the world and it does not conform to the reality and the velopment of this tion shall be brou sys ght tem. Therefore it should be revised and the anti-terrorism administrative under judicial review. justiciable future de-confirma-tion shall be brought under judicial review.
作者 戚建刚
出处 《中外法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第4期976-991,共16页 Peking University Law Journal
基金 本文获得国家社科基金2017年度重点课题“环境风险治理工具的行政法进路研究”(项目编号:17AAFX013)的资助.
关键词 《反恐怖主义法》 反恐行政认定 不可诉性 Anti-Terrorism Law Anti-Terrorism Administrative Affirmation Non-justiciable
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献122

  • 1姜明安.我国行政程序立法模式选择[J].中国法学,1995(6):43-47. 被引量:48
  • 2高铭暄,王俊平.恐怖组织界定[J].国家检察官学院学报,2006,14(2):86-90. 被引量:8
  • 3赵秉志,杜邈.恐怖组织认定模式之研究[J].现代法学,2006,28(3):106-111. 被引量:23
  • 4刘飞宇,黎建锋.对“曾被剥夺政治权利的人员禁止在娱乐场所从业”规定的若干质疑[J].山东社会科学,2007(2):18-22. 被引量:9
  • 5Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333 (1976) ;quoting Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545, 522 (1965).
  • 6O. Hood Phillips, Paul , Jackson & Patricia Leopold, Constitutional and Administrative Law, 8th ed. (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2001) at paras. 31.001 -31.020.
  • 7Anti Terrorism Act, S.C. 2001 ss. 83.05 (2) (8) ; J.J. Rowe, "The Terrorism Act 2000" [2001] Crim. L. Rev. 527 at 527. ss. 4 -6.
  • 8Art. 1 ( 1 ) of the Prevention of Terrorist Ordinance of Israel, Transmitted to the Secretariat of the U. N by that government on 22 may 2001.
  • 9Art. 139 of Federal Penal Code and art. 2 of Federal Act against Organized Crime Transmitted to the Secretariat of the UN, by that government on 25 February. 1998 and 15 June 2001.
  • 10Art. 304 and art. 306 of the Penal Code of Syria Arab Republic, transmitted to the Secretariat of the UN by that government on 11 June 2001.

共引文献162

同被引文献50

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部