期刊文献+

二十世纪《诗经》学“价值”的瓦解与重建 被引量:2

The Disintegration and Reconstruction of the“Value”in the Study of The Book of Songs in the Twentieth Century
下载PDF
导出
摘要 辛亥鼎革之前,《诗经》一直以经学面目出现,清末以前学者始终关注的都是《诗三百》中的价值问题。至章太炎以《诗》为史,始将经学一变而为史学,成为《诗经》学价值被解构的开始。此后,胡适等新一代学人视《诗经》为史料,经学价值被进一步解构。同样由胡适倡导而获"古史辨"派助推的《诗经》文学化解读在1930年代走进歌谣化。至闻一多以西方理论为标准的《诗经》研究的出现,《诗经》文学化解读基本定型。1980年代出现的以"文化"为号召的《诗经》研究,其实是起于文学又最终获得文学首肯的。回望百年《诗经》学,可以看出,彻底瓦解《诗经》经学的道德价值而将其引入历史、史料和文学,从一开始就存在诸多问题。然而今天《诗经》学回归纯粹经学研究既无可能,也无必要,而以文学理解为前提,同时部分肯定诗教传统中的价值期许,或可成为今后《诗经》学努力的方向。 Before the Revolution of 1911, the study of The Book of Songs always appeared in classicism, which means that before the end of the Qing dynasty, scholars paid attention to the issue of value in it. When Zhang Taiyan took The Book of Songs as history, he initiated a shift from classicism to history, marking the beginning of deeonstrueting the value of The Book of Songs. Since then, a new generation of scholars such as Hu Shi regarded The Book of Songs as a historical material, and its value as a Confucian classic was further deconstructed. The literary interpretation of The Book of Songs, also advocated by Hu Shi and promoted by the "Ancient History Discrimination" School, became more obsessed with treating the songs as ballads in the 1930s. The literary interpretation became established when Wen Yiduo applied Western theories to the study of The Book of Songs. The focus of study in the 1980s was "culture", but actually it stemmed from literature and eventually won the approval of literature. Looking back at the study of The Book of Songs in the past century, we can see that to completely dismantle the moral value of The Book of Songs by connecting it to history, historical materials and literature was problematic in the very beginning. However, it is neither possible nor unnecessary for the study of The Book of Songs to return to pure Confucian classicism; rather, to take literary understanding as a precondition, and partially affirming the value of traditional didacticism by poetry, might be a reasonable direction for the future study of The Book of Songs.
作者 王长华 赵棚鸽 Wang Changhua;Zhao Pengge(distinguished professor of Huaqiao University and a professor of Hebei Normal University.His main research interest is literature and culture of the pre-Qin and Han dynasties.Address: School of Humanities of Huaqiao University,Fengze District,Quanzhou 362000,Fujian,Chin;associate professor of Luoyang Institute of Technology.His main research area is literature and culture of the pre-Qin and Hart dynasties.Address : School of Humanities and Social Sciences,Luoyang Institute of Science and Technology,No.8 Xuezi Road,Luolong District,Luoyang 471023,Henan,China)
出处 《文艺理论研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第4期66-79,共14页 Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art
关键词 《诗经》 经学价值 史学与史料 瓦解 重建 The Book of Songs value as a classic history and historical materials collapse reconstruction
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1皮锡瑞.经学通论·诗经通论[M].北京:中华书局,1954..
  • 2葛兆光.思想史研究课堂讲录[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2005.
  • 3《中国哲学史大纲》卷上,中华书局1991年版,第68页
  • 4顾颉刚.诗经在春秋战国间的地位[A].古史辨(第3册)[C].上海:上海古籍出版社,1981.309-310.
  • 5何定生.诗经今论[M].台北:台湾"商务印书馆",1968.
  • 6钱穆.读诗经[A].钱宾四先生全集(第18册)[C].台北:台湾经联出版社,1998.165.
  • 7郑振铎.读毛诗序[A].古史辨(第3册)[C].上海:上海古籍出版社,1981.385.
  • 8顾颉刚.论时序附会史事的方法书[A].古史辨(第3册)[C].上海:上海古籍出版社,1981.405.
  • 9钱玄同.论诗经真相书[A].古史辨(第1册)[C].上海:上海古籍出版社,1981.46-47.
  • 10胡适.谈谈诗经[A].古史辨(第1册)[C].上海:上海古籍出版社,1981.577.

共引文献4

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部